Ragian wrote:Votanic wrote:Ragian wrote:I love it when you yell in writing. Makes me feel special.
Now, what do you expect to gain from lynching swang? What is the road to salvation this time?
He could be scum,
yes he really could.. and even if he is Town, he is a minimal loss because he's hardly playing anyway.
Now you answer my question, Mr. No-Lynch, What
useful information do you
realistically expect to have tomorrow that you don't have today?
Hint: Just knowing that a townie was night-killed is not useful.
No patterns? No "this person did so and so, which means that when knowing whether swang is town or not will infer that..."? Your "he could be scum" is based on you saying he isn't playing. Have you done a post count? Has he posted the least in this game?
*looks around for whoever Mr. No-Lynch is* Is it DDS?
It's you, Rag, based on what you said
Ragian wrote: If you only want to lynch confirmed scum, you should vote for no lynch.
Your problem Rag is that your primary impetus for playing is to make snarky remarks instead of really working for a Town win.
Interesting, if I did switch to DDS that would make a three-way tie... not quite random, but there is a whiff of it... and I do think Town isn't going to have better odds than random in this game.
Of course, if I did make it a three-way tie, that would certainly encourage the
opportunistic to dash in at the last moment and pick their favourite...
Hammerer, you'd better be right... Of course, that implies that Town would be wise enough to rise up and not treat a town-killing hammer as an innocent mistake...
...but let's face it, Town really is disorganized and apathetic. As it is, players like LC and Swang can just goof off at work all day with no risk of being
fired.
If this unbalanced game is a psych experiment... maybe I should generate some data or at least an entertaining cliffhanger.
Maybe...