Moderator: Community Team
Charle wrote:I really do not understand why pmc and Ragian tried so hard to change the vote from Swang to DDS who we all know is a very good player for town, and he is fun as well. Or maybe i DO understand. If you go through the last posts you could see that it was scum talking to each other and convince people to change votes. Now town has lost 2 good players.
Anyway, it will need serious convincing to change my mind that the following three are not our obvious scum fellas.
1. Swang
2. PMC
3. Ragian
This is PMC's style like in the previous game when we were scum. He first voted for me (fellow scum) to put a decoy there, and then changed his vote later to make sure the train on me would not generate. In this game, when he realise that the train was on Swang, he quickly changed his vote to DDS and with Ragian's help, they could manage to get the vote away from their fellow scum mate, Swang.
I am happy to cast my vote to any of the three above, going to be an interesting day 2.
Maxleod wrote:swang918 wrote:Don't want to get too close to the deadline and miss a chance to save myself.
unvote dev, vote No Lynch
I'd rather lynch someone than no lynch, but I'd rather no lynch than get lynched.
Or you could vote DDS, that would save you too. Why no lynch?
Loose Canon wrote:And when I look at Maxs posts - they have said nothing.
Started with a joke post about DDS being suss for not taking the game seriously (in the joke phase) , and then reinforced/agreed with other players suss of DDS.
no more contributions than that really.
Back seating inching of other players to a mislynch - whilst avoiding sticking his head above the parapet.
Scum tell for me.
Loose Canon wrote:For D2 voting strategy I'm going to suggest the following;
Put 2 players up for lynch vote and once those players are up we just lynch one or the other IF (until) Night Actions Do NOT (do) reveal a firm lynchee
First player to get 3 Votes D2 is the first candidate for lynching (could be the player Swang reveals he is most suss of)
The First candidate for lynching chooses the Second lynchee candidate.
Would make it a straight duke out between 2 players, could have later advantages, there's already been a lot of suspicions thrown around D1 already, mafia manipulation of votes is a possibility/probability whether we did this or not.
Does anyone want to argue this is a bad idea, or suggest something better?
kongming3 wrote:Not the absolute worst case scenario (no dead PRs), but definitely not ideal. Definitely a little hectic with how the last part of the day went, didn't realize that the day was ending which is a shame because more information would have been nice. Charle, I won't comment on the other two for now but I'd struggle to put Swang as obvious scum. Maintaining suspicions is fine but I'd say purely from a gameplay perspective if Swang is town it's completely logical for a 100% townsfolk (to him) to act in presumably both his and towns best interests by looking to lynch someone else instead who is less than 100% likely to be town according to information known.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
pmchugh wrote:Your narrative makes no sense, I wasn't trying hard to get DDS lynched in fact swang should have been lynched because of when the deadline was set, EW never kept to it and allowed the votes after his initial deadline. Neither of which was me, and kong who actually was the one who pushed it never made your list some how.
Extreme Ways wrote:Regarding dayphase end, it ends on Sunday the 19th 5pm CCT. Any posts after this will not be considered.
Check what this means in your local timezone: https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/g ... nt=cursive
Loose Canon wrote:Hey Vot.
I like that you are using EWs player list numbers to order your thoughts about players.
Regarding player 6, he thinks Ridicule is Nothing to be Scared of.
To answer more your and Strikes criticism of what I'm suggesting for D2 voting narrowing it down to 2 players.
Everyone is up for consideration early in a day.
Encourages players to post their suspicions early to influence who the first candidate is.
Takes 3 actual votes to make a player the first candidate.
First candidate chooses the alternative candidate.
Just limits later candidates being thrown into the mix later in that day as a distraction.
Focuses and Simplifies for Town
Scum will Hate It.
Come on argue seriously or concede.
Stand and Deliver!
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users