Moderator: Community Team
homer_jay wrote:SoN!c wrote:Loose stated that the resort is legit. But playing a poker game in the boiler room? That sounds "off grid resort" dodgy.. So with 13 players in a legit resort i guess the scum is to be found at that shady poker table? Who else has the same idea?
are the poker players also supposed to be guessing 5 players at the table in order to win the goodie bag? because if so, that means it's not typical "mafia" in that they don't know each other? but then that raises questions on how night kills work as a collective.
guess i'm a little confused![]()
SoN!c wrote:[
Charle ticking all boxes on a scum Charle version sofar/quote]SoN!c wrote:FP by Charle who just unticked one of his boxes
Care to share some boxes for the benefit of town?TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:I actually think that at leasst one Scum is at the table. but ofc I have nothing to back that up. But yeah town power roles might be at the table as well.
Why do you think this?homer_jay wrote:there are two options for the table.
if it is a situation where it's a shady game, then maybe certain roles were selected for the table, and those randomly assigned those roles are there.. which would likely be a mix of scum and certain power roles (vigilante type, so not scum, but not a "by the book" character either)
or the table spots are randomly assigned, so it'll be a mix of scum, power roles, vanilla townies
i don't think we have any indications yet which way it goes
Here, again...I can't help but being pinged by this. These posts are speculations about a setup we cannot know about. Basically, it's a waste of time. It makes me think that Homer is trying to look as if he's participating when actually he's bringing nothing to the table (giggles). (This, incidentally, is also my answer to jfm's question, which I think I understand now rereading the thread.)
Jfm goes in a similar category with his post following Homer's. But to a lesser extent.Extreme Ways wrote:Also correct me if I'm wrong but in one post, it gets highlighted that I'm still voting Rag and I respond that it's a d1 vote and just a single vote - whatever.
In another post, Sonic says I am getting too invested over a single vote.
Rag/Sonic, what do you make of your ideas surrounding this?
unvote
I highlighted that you were still voting me. I think. I was just suffering from a broken heart. That was meant as banter. I'm not too sure I understand your question correctly. But, on another note, where have you gone?
In the interest of balance, Homer made a comment on EW that has nothing to do with setup but is slightly accusatory. That takes some of the scummy away.kongming3 wrote:I read you loud and clear EW.
Wow...what is this?
EW came back to vote Son!c. I can't tell if EW is geuinely annoyed with Son!c because it's frustrating to be in the hot seat due to merit or because Son!c actually stumpled upon something.Charle wrote:I just have a feeling that Sonic might be onto something, so I am going to follow him. In the same breath I really like EW's strategy to lynch day 1 so that we keep the first move with Town.
So in this case, Vote Devante
This "feeling". What is that based on?SoN!c wrote:
And unvote
I rattled enough cages and know all i wanna know on D1.
Vote no lynch
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Charle wrote:I was at first also thinking what boxes of mine were ticked, but then Sonic told us he was just rattling some cages.
I would like to know what Max and King has to say, just anything to know that they are still with us.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
kongming3 wrote:I read you loud and clear EW.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users