Moderator: Community Team
Ragian wrote:Unvote vote Ragian
No bluff. I just went to bed. Nice try, though. Obviously, I'd prefer lynching you first because town will now lose their last protective role, but trading me for scum D3 is still doable for town if the rest of town wakes the fudge up and participates.
@EW, you seemed to be role-fishing, and I felt no inclination to share anything because my hands are clean. If you asked me flat out in what would've felt like a non-antagonist way, I must have skimmed it while out hiking. It's never a good thing to check a mafia thread on the phone while cooking food on a bonfire.
I'm out for the rest of the day (I'll be here a couple of hours more). I'm looking forward to reading all of Son!c's ways to get out of being lynched.
---
FYI, do not speed lynch Son!c D3, but do lynch him. You need to establish who's likely to be his scumbuddies before ending the day.
Ragian wrote:@Chana, yes. I think it should be fairly clear now, so I might as well state it unambiguously: I am a town protective role, and I'm ready to sacrifice myself for town (which is the nature of that role - only usually slightly differently) if we get scum. I will still win with town, and, while I won't be nominated for MoM, I'll find solace in helping town move forward.
Ragian wrote:I'm off for today. I think it would be good if I just stop typing the rest of D2, so the rest of you can decide. I'm quite sure, though, that Son!c will continue polluting the thread with his, "What scum would do is this and that, while town would never do this and that" nonsense. Hopefully, you can see through the BS.
Toodles!
Loose Canon wrote:Sonic you are wrong to want Rag lynched today - but understandably so.
You were also wrong with your EW is too good a player thing.
I've called you out when your wrong and supported you when the evidence said you in a as straight choice between you and Rag were town.
Its not a straight choice - choosing either is wrong - today at least.
Leap of faith here mate - please vote EW.
You too Rag - please vote EW.
At least challenge my flow of logic if you must stick where you are.
Loose Canon wrote:Sonic I have searched it is EW, I just can't seem to persuade - frustrating but challenging and fun.
chanakam2020 wrote:Extreme Ways wrote:Rag's play is exactly how I would play it as scum - until recently at least. It's very likely both visited Halrob and it's indeed 1 scum 1 town and realistically we should eliminate outside of it as the serial killer can go for both slots, aiming to hif mafia.
Wait.
So you did not know (Before Sonics acceptance of visiting Halrob) exactly the number of players and who visited Halrob ?
But you only knew someone visited him & that could be single player or multiple players ?
Am I interpreting your above sentence correctly ?
.
![]()
![]()
Ragian wrote:@chana, why do you want to know if I visited halrob? Imagine that a town protective role (perhaps?) unable to protect the same player two nights in a row is asked whom they protected the night before. That gives scum a free hit on that player because that player will be without protection the next night. Therefore, the question (as well as EW's questioning me that) gives off a scummy vibe a la, "So, what player cannot be protected N2?"
FP'ed by Son!c's blah blah blah. First I bluff, then it's a bad move. Sheesh, it's getting to a point where it's becoming cringeI mean, thinking that I'm "pushing through a mislynch" when I'm voting myself is quite laughable.
Vote me (and take the bullet D3) or yourself. Preferably the latter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users