HardAttack wrote:Jeff Hardy wrote:HardAttack wrote:Night Strike wrote:In my opinion (definitely not official or anything), I'm guessing that it's one of those things where if you do it a few times to avoid missing turns, etc. it's permissible. But if you start abusing it, then there will be consequences.
Like in this situation, lanyards sitting for JCKing one game when he suddenly had to leave is ok. If lanyards were to do this every time you tried to play JCKing, then it would be account abuse (and could very well be busted together).
The problem here is a bit different N.S. Lanyard is a foe of aliakber and lanyards knows it according to aliakber's statement. Neither in his own account(system does not allow him to do so) nor in some other's account lanyards(system does nothing about this) should not play against him. This is what aliakber mostly angry about.
so JCKing should have deadbeat
There are cases Jeff and i dont know anything so much...Then i will speak according to the cases...
Case 1: JC knew lanyards is foe of aliakber. Then if i were JC, i wud call someone else but not lanyards. Cos lanyards is foe of ali.
Case 2:If JC knew nothing about the foe stuff between ali and lanyards then JC has nothign to do with this subject.
Case 3: In all cases (1 and/or 2) lanyards should have rejected JC putting his excuse that he is foe of ali. This is what i find to be out of ethic.
And ali is right in this matter cos he has been forced to play with someone who has been foed by him in some indirect ways...
That is all what i say.
he had to go really quickly because of rl and we were chatting to lany on msn at the time so he told lany the password and left
should lany have just refused and just let JC deadbeat simply because aliakber is a sore loser and has lany on foe because lany is better than him?