
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Thai Robert wrote:What happened was that Warsteiner and Strakkebillen were having unannounced alliances in October, or announcing it in Dutch.
And though the Dutch chatting has halted on CC. The unannounced alliances are continuing about 1 month after their warning.
The following research is based on the period between Sully's warning and the next accusation (Oct 22 - Dec 4). The period in which Warsteiner still thought he could get away with the warning:
In all these games no alliance was announced (and none were left out):
6-players:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1323479 0 3
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1311052 1 3
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1309927 0 4
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1309715 0 2
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1302935 0 3
Strakkebillen managed to attack Warsteiner just ONCE in the first 3 rounds while he managed to attack others 15 times. That's 3x the average.
5-players:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1310304 0 2
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1243131 0 3
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1225792 0 3
In these games Strakkebillen didn't manage to strike at Warsteiner at all in the first 3 rounds. But did attack others 8 times.
4-players:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1303405 1 2
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1280318 0 2
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1280225 0 8
In these games Strakkebillen attacked Warsteiner again just once. But attacked others 12 times in the first 3 rounds. 4x the average!
Now do the probability calculation and see how likely this is.
I've only counted the first 3 rounds because in later stages, it happens that Warsteiner is already superior and no harm can be done anymore. Or the opposite where Warsteiner will loose no matter what Strakkebillen will do. In the first 3 rounds the game's still open and Strakkebillen will have to be careful about attacking Warsteiner. It's clear Strakkebillen serves Warsteiner. Not the other way around...
comic boy wrote:Isnt it loathsome to see a convicted cheat like Krusher trying so hard to get others dragged down into the gutter with him, bitter or what
Incandenza wrote:comic boy wrote:Isnt it loathsome to see a convicted cheat like Krusher trying so hard to get others dragged down into the gutter with him, bitter or what
That may be, but this thread is what ultimately happens when one plays with RL friend(s)/family in singles games, "well, if I can't win, at least my buddy will."
This is why there are a lot of people on this site, myself included, that do not play singles, especially public singles, with said RL friend(s)/family, to prevent just this sort of accusation.
At the very least, something should be posted in game chat right off the bat, just to make sure there's no understanding, and that doesn't appear to have been done here.
Warsteiner wrote:We can make it a rule that you can't play with rl friends/family or have to pos that you know them IRL.
However, as said, you can see from my games that I've played fair with all the RL friends i have battled. Apperently strakkebillen is the one not managing to beat me, all the others have done that a few more times.. It's how the game rolls.. I'm simply a little better than thosebut you bet they want to beat me for sure.. big points and a good laugh at me as they think I'm too addicted and that i should stop playing this game and play poker
i'm sure they want nothing more than to strip my points.
Risktaker17 wrote:I have no doubt in my mind that Warsteiner is innocent.
Scott-Land wrote:Risktaker17 wrote:I have no doubt in my mind that Warsteiner is innocent.
I do recall you saying the same thing about Krusher-- I have a feeling you were involved in that as much as Irish and the others.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users