lanyards, JCKing [Cleared & Noted]

by **JCKing** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:29 pm

Hmm that's where you are wrong. I didn't abuse the system. By what asking some one to take moves for me. I had no part of the foe list of aliakber I found the best freestyle player online to make my moves, simple as that. Not my fault I had to leave b/c my Dad yells at me for not helping fix the garage door, especially when I didn't even know he was out there. If you can point out where the mods said I abused the system then by all means tell me Kotaro otherwise please be quiet.

by **lanyards** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:43 pm

Kotaro wrote:Flaming in your own thread is a sign of a weak argument.

So, I'm now going to claim my dad came into the room and forced me to make another account. Please don't punish me, it's not my fault.

For all those who are reading:

JCK abused the system, and now that it's thrown in public, lanyards and Jeff Hardy are flaming in their own thread, because their argument is weak and pathetic.

My argument is I don't cheat. On the subject of pathetic, find some examples of me cheating. Your argument is kinda failing without anything to back it up. Good luck.

by **TheBro** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:14 pm

Wasn't there a new rule about someone checking in on a game not theirs and saying 'abusive' things? Lanyards' comments were hardly abusive, but I could see how the could be at the least annoying to Ali, and apparently to Clapper too...

Anywho, they obviously didn't cheat.

by **lanyards** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:23 pm

TheBro wrote:Wasn't there a new rule about someone checking in on a game not theirs and saying 'abusive' things? Lanyards' comments were hardly abusive, but I could see how the could be at the least annoying to Ali, and apparently to Clapper too...

Anywho, they obviously didn't cheat.

Haha. I love Clapper, I would never say anything offensive to her. And do you really think I can provoke a grown man into cursing his head off?

by **TheBro** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:27 pm

Well 'grown man' and 'head off' can be disputed.... So maybe? :mrgreen:

by **jarrett155** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:27 pm

aliakber1001 wrote:Accused:
[JCKing
[Jeff Hardy
[lanyards
The accused are suspected of:

Other: Lanyard is accused of playing on jcking account in middle of speed game and not even telling us. he has jckings password starts playing for jcking and then tells us at the end when the games almost over that and i quote
''2009-02-05 15:30:03 - JCKing: JC had to go a while ago, so this has been lanyards pwning your ass.''
like he states he had been playing on jckings account and didnt even tell us untill the game was over. I have lanyards on ignore theres a reason for that because i dont want him playing with me. he joins someone jckings account and i do not approve of that, i would have deadbeated the game if he had said it earlyer that he is playing on his account. so what is this? so if some one has me on ignore, i can just join under someone elses account and play them? and reason jeff hardy is also accused is because he had full knowledge of this and didnt say it either. they are all 3 being acussed of cheating, baby sitting abuse or whatever you want to callit. i hope appropriate action is taken. and if you want to know the reason for my out brust in game chat it was because i was so mad of being cheated like this. i am sure u would be upset also if someone u have on ignore joins under a different account.

Game number(s):

Game 4196578

Comments. i think this is messed up, if no action is taken, i am going to start doing the same thing, ask people who are playing against people who have me on foe, and ask if they want me to finish there games or like in lanyards case join in round 1 or 2 .

lmao so you would brake the rules? how hypocritical.

by **Kotaro** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:28 pm

Well, according to the mods, this is completely legal, to have someone account sit against their foe. I intend to fully take this exploit and use it as much as I want, since the mods refuse to take any action against it.

Thank you mods, you've made this game enjoyable again

by **lanyards** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:31 pm

Kotaro wrote:Well, according to the mods, this is completely legal, to have someone account sit against their foe. I intend to fully take this exploit and use it as much as I want, since the mods refuse to take any action against it.

Thank you mods, you've made this game enjoyable again

People you sit for can not join join games that they know they cannot finish.

by **Kotaro** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:34 pm

Haha, well, you know, they all have dads, who just might come storming into the room, and than, I'm the only one they're talking to on MSN. A shame really, but what's a good friend to do? Let them deadbeat? No, that is unthinkable! I'll take over like any good person would.

by **HardAttack** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:38 pm

This seemed to be ping pong from now on. One is saying that he has not abused the system, another one says he did. The one who previously said he didnt abuse the system stating again he didnt, and the other one is saying again no he did.
Ping pong games are played over 3 sets and each set includes 21 points etc...
How many points and sets the game here being played lasts guys ?
Some mod, i ask very kindly, please lock this already judged and noted subject =D>

by **lanyards** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:46 pm

I am noted, what exactly does that mean?

by **HardAttack** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:56 pm

it means this case should not repeat itself. Case s been noted and if something similar happens, this case will be referenced to discuss on the next one...

by **Kotaro** on Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:03 pm

It means that, the mods know you have broken the rules, but they're pussies, in the sense that, since this wasn't blatantly stated in the rules that you're not allowed to do what you did, that they're afraid of pissy customers if they enforce an obvious exploit.