look, I thought I had explainede myself clearly the first time. I started playing this game earlier last week, so I am still new here. I found out about this game through a thread on this board here
http://www.brewboard.com/index.php?showtopic=59264
Now, first yes I should have attaked his because it would have taken his bonus away, I realize that now. I didnt see it at the time, it was really late and I made a bad call. Sorry if you pointed it out several times aswell. As far as I can remeber, the country in question with 1 troop had two others next to it with multiple troops so I didnt attack it for fear of retaliation and having him ravage through all of my territories. Does that make sense at all? I swear to you that I am not a multi, do what you can check ip's, email, however else you guys do it. I would just like the feedback removec because I feel it is unjust and not called for.
The reason I started to say I didnt want to talk about it anymore is because I was tired of defending myself for something that I was not doing, that is all I got for you there.
I hope that answers your question.
