Conquer Club

jacuse [cleared]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

jacuse [cleared]

Postby wannaseemytreat on Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:46 pm

game;3957183

TheCharles
jdoman
outrebor1st

im not sure if this is cheating or not but im pretty sure its not fair play.

these 3 grouped together to ensure that i wasnt going to win and played to ensure that one of them did

also when one of them was dominant they didnt group together to defeat him they did nothing

it wasnt so much hidden diplomacy so much as it was completely open and in ur face

take a look let me know what you think
User avatar
Cook wannaseemytreat
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:34 am

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby lancehoch on Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:15 pm

Can you please format your post in the following manner:

Name(s) of the Accused:

Suspected of: (delete what does not apply) Multi/Secret Alliance/Abuse/Other

Related Game(s):

Comments:
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby Fuzzylogic99 on Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:32 pm

sound like a secret alliance / diplomacy ....You should post a formal complaint by using the
the mod posted in the previous post...
User avatar
Private 1st Class Fuzzylogic99
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 5:47 am

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby Blinkadyblink on Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:26 am

It seems that they did announce a treaty in the game chat, so technically no rules were broken. If you feel that this was poor sportsmanship, leave them low ratings and foe them. I don't think you'll be able to do much else.
User avatar
Major Blinkadyblink
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: The Local Group

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby wannaseemytreat on Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:48 pm

i thought so. however, i don`t see the point of differentiating between hidden and open diplomacy the two are equally wrong. your playing against unequal numbers whichever you choose
User avatar
Cook wannaseemytreat
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:34 am

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby lancehoch on Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:54 pm

If you could please state what the claim is and structure a post in this thread to follow the form that I have already posted. I am currently unsure of what you would like looked at.
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby wannaseemytreat on Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:22 pm

Name(s) of the Accused:
TheCharles
jdoman
outrebor1st

Suspected of: (delete what does not apply) Other

Related Game(s):game;3957183


Comments:im not sure if this is cheating or not but im pretty sure its not fair play.

these 3 grouped together to ensure that i wasnt going to win and played to ensure that one of them did

also when one of them was dominant they didnt group together to defeat him they did nothing

it wasnt so much hidden diplomacy so much as it was completely open and in ur face

take a look let me know what you think
User avatar
Cook wannaseemytreat
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:34 am

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby sailorseal on Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:03 pm

They are not multis and had no secret alliance
User avatar
Cook sailorseal
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: conquerclub.com

Re: jacuse [No Form]

Postby king achilles on Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:40 am

Based from that game, they are cleared of secret diplomacy and they are not multi accounts with each other.
Image
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.
User avatar
Lieutenant king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13362
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users