Ultimagu + Eewilson [settled]

by **Italianboy97** on Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:59 pm

<DELETE ME>
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

Be sure before you accuse someone!
</DELETE ME>

Accused:

Ultimagu
Eewilson

The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

4148429

Comments: Eewilson wrote "ok red (Ultimagu) sounds good. one turn notice if either one of us wants to call it off (secret diplomacy). he wrote this without any writing about any alliance in the game chat.

by **Royal Panda** on Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:44 pm

Except for the comment immediately prior to it? :roll:

by **Darwins_Bane** on Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:34 pm

reading the game log this seems like a retaliatory accusation more than anything else.

by **Masli** on Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:02 am

Darwins_Bane wrote:reading the game log this seems like a retaliatory accusation more than anything else.

totally agree with you :lol:

by **SirSebstar** on Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:25 am

Lets fill it out then.

Accused: Italianboy97

The accused is suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s): Game 4148429

Comments: Italianboy97 apparently proposed a secret alliance to both players in the game by posting a comment on their respective walls. Since such requests were not made in the chatpane this is a violation of the CC rules. Furthermore, Italianboy97 accuses both players of a secret alliance, even though they have writen the proposal in chat first, and publicly agreed and is demonstrating a clear lack of writing skills by being unable to fill out a form properly.

by **SirSebstar** on Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:34 am

oops, did i totally miss this page,
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=76741
Italianboy97 has already been warned for this, disregard above message and just close the thread

by **Masli** on Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:45 am

lol, and you also posted in that topic this morning. Erg grappig :lol:

by **SirSebstar** on Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:49 am

that's why it was so familiar..

by **gcwca_4_life** on Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:47 am

Shall we bring something from that game chat real fast?

Game Chat wrote:2009-02-04 22:23:26 - Ultimagu: green...what do you think of a nonaggression pact in our controlled bonus areas? Meaning no fighting where we already have claimed a bonus?
2009-02-04 22:44:53 - eewilson: ok red - sounds good. one turn notice if either one of us want to call it off

He did state it in the game chat. Therefore, not a secret alliance, and not against the rules!

by **SirSebstar** on Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:58 am

Pander88uk wrote:Except for the comment immediately prior to it?

by **FabledIntegral** on Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:42 pm

This guy totally isn't furthering the stereotypes that cooks aren't just retarded concerning merely gameplay, but in the realm of logic as well. Yayyyy for retards.