Moderator: Cartographers
Ogrecrusher wrote:What what?!
TaCktiX wrote:grayhawke, don't you dare abandon this map right now. ...
grayhawke wrote:TaCktiX wrote:grayhawke, don't you dare abandon this map right now. ...
When you put it like that I just don't kmow - I could always give up sleeping I suppose...
Thanks, your support is appreciated, but as I said above it seems clear to me that this map will not be allowed to progress. I guess it is judged not to have the required support - no amount of graphic updates will make the idea any more acceptable - and this area is supposed to be about the idea, not the graphics nor the gameplay.TaCktiX wrote:I just finished my junior year of Electrical Engineering. ...
grayhawke wrote: - and this area is supposed to be about the idea, not the graphics nor the gameplay.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Unit_2 wrote:Sweet, so what EXACTLY do you guys want changed besides the graphics?
gimil wrote: --- idea passed ---
Here you go.
gimil wrote:But let me say the graphics for this are going to need a good hard think about because it wont get quenched the way its going jsut now
t-o-m wrote:And having to hold 15 places to win?? Seriously? No1 would do that - this map seems like ur just trying to get as many gameplay gimmicks in as possible! Get rid of the hold all=win
pamoa wrote:Ansd t-o-m if you think making a map is a 1 hour job let show us your talent! give us some map idea!
Ruben Cassar wrote:The title should be Imperium Romanum Sacrum in Latin.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users