happysadfun wrote:And what about replacing ... ...and Missouri with Illinois...
yes
illinois =12,419,293 population
missouri =5,595,211 population
notice missouri has 6,824,082 less people than illinois ( as of 2000)
Moderator: Cartographers
happysadfun wrote:And what about replacing ... ...and Missouri with Illinois...
cramill wrote:I don't know if this is too late to suggest, but seince the small map is still being worked on I assume that one small change can be made. I think Belize should be renamed Guatemala. Guatemala is a larger and more populated, and more important country than Belize.
: GUATEMALA : BELIZE
AREA (sq km) : 108,890 : 22,966
POPULATION : 12,974,361 : 256,062
GDP (million US$) : 46,200 : 790
DublinDoogey wrote:
Here's one with gray circles, not really to my liking but if you guys think they'd be better than the white ones we'll use the gray ones.
Let me know, thanks
-doogey
Master Bush wrote:Best looking map yet!
gavin_sidhu wrote:Master Bush wrote:Best looking map yet!
obviously you havent played middle earth, i dont think anything beats middle earth visually.
Best looking map yet!
happysadfun wrote:how bout amalgamating kansas and nebraska like you did with the midwest? and some of the other central states too
marv wrote:Suggestion? How about do it bigger? Because I usually do the small version with 80-84% of the size of the big version. It seems you used a smaller proportion, so maybe you could do it a little bigger, huh? What the proportion you used, by the way?
happysadfun wrote:say, do nunavut and greenland have circles?
Hoff wrote:I think it looks good and i'm excited to play this map.
gavin_sidhu wrote:Hoff wrote:I think it looks good and i'm excited to play this map.
as i do. I want to play a three player game (how many reinforcement will i recieve per turn then?)
DublinDoogey wrote:If you guys think that the small map is fine, I'll start on the small xml, I mean, I'm ok with it, but it's truly up to the foundry
Users browsing this forum: No registered users