MrBenn wrote:
If you're going down the route of adding text labels to the territories, why not give each one a distinct name? Otherwise I think the alpha-bete-delta-gamma labels add a layer of confusion
As soon as we went with the English text vesion of this map I mentioned to prem that I thought someone would raise the point of "if you can fit text on there then why can't you stick unique names on there"
Prems exact response was... and I quote... " beacause we bloody well don't want to" and to be honest I agree , I am more in favour of the Greek alphabetic symbols myself cos I think it looks awesome and is something completely new to the site, if the site can't handle it then thats fair enough,However if it is discovered that the site will support thse characters then I will revert to them in the blink of an eye if I can.
However: Out side of that we have bent, agreed, molded and submitted to just about every whim of the community up to now with the belief that they were pushing to have a map that that they would play and enjoy. This is our first map and we may have approached it in a naieve manner (seems that way nearly a year on) but we have learned and grown as cartographers and intend fully to produce more maps in the future. There has to be a point where the people designing and developing a map get to draw a line and have a final decision and seeing as
Mr Benn is the only person at the moment that seems to have found fault with the alpha beta gamma wording.. I am making that decision( unless I am proven wrong) as the designer (with copious amounts of help).
I think in the end I have to agree with Prem in that Thule Alpha , Thule Beta , Thule Gamma is no less confusing than Thule 1 , Thule 2 . Thule 3 and actually most likely looks a bit better.
In fact it is no worse than the territs of Feudal war and that has passed through the system with little issue already and is about to get an epic sequel.
I am not trying to upset people but we have done some serious work on this, as does any person interested in creating a map, we have accepted input and adapted in accordance with everyone and anyone , we employed outside help to add final varnish (cheers Sam) and tweaks(ender you were a God send). If the map is not of a quality sufficient to be played on then state that , if it is a personal dislike of a particular element of the map then say so but be mature enough to allow public opinion to outweigh that but, if there is a more obvious reason I have missed then please let me know as I cannot honestly think what more it is we need to bend and mold to get what we have done passed through the stringent and exacting stantards of the Forge.
Please accept my apologies for my abrupt and irritated manner but I feel the map was judged without reading through the existing comments and input from well known map makers.
I believe if the decision on the acceptance of a map falls on a single person then the whole pretence of the forum and forge approach is flawed. I believed it allowed popular input and decision to guide the quenching of a map.. I suppose that must be the Naievety I mentioned earlier surfacing again
Please have a look at the map, judge it on the Graphical merits and the discussions that have been on going, If it is not acceptable to the community as a whole then fine, we are happy to continue looking at it(erm... we may need help her!)
Again apologies for my harshness but I may be feeling a little agrieved.
Nem.
p.s If ther are graphical changes that need doing I am more than happy to look at them