Moderator: Cartographers
the.killing.44 wrote:Sea line connectors
MrBenn wrote:Technically it's a "falling sun" (as the lines come down instead of up), but I think we can let it pass...
RedBaron0 wrote:Might be part of the transfer, I'll likely try a version that's a .png see if that's any better.
RedBaron0 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Sea line connectorsNow all that jitter and stuff makes perfect sense.
EDIT Ignore that last statement.... NOW I get it, and you're so right 44, thanks!
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
RedBaron0 wrote:
I think it worked out pretty well. Still working on the sea connections... I downloaded photoshop for just this, free trail. The paths tool is so much different than GIMP'sI think I'll have to try another way anyways. Function trumps form so the lines need to be clearly connecting each territory and achieve this painted on look. I think the text has come out better using photoshop too.(I retyped them) I may have to still think about using an outer glow or drop shadow on the text, very lightly in the spots where the lines cross borders the territory names are getting a bit lost, but not too badly.
jefjef wrote:Think your way too light on your title stamp. I've owned Japanese silk paintings that had red stamps on them and they were very crisp. Not faint at all.
elfish_lad wrote:Okay damn it. I know I'm a newt to the map world but... I feel like we are taking a step back here. The versions where we were talking about waves and cool Japanese paper looking maps ROCKED and this one... is great, but looks like every other very good map at CC. Maybe I've missed the general shift here but I don't (personally) think this is a step forward. I loved the modern look of versions before this.
Sorry if I am off track on this and ignore me if I am but Red I LOVED the other version better.
Cheers, and thanks for all your hard work here.
E.
the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
The font and calligraphy tried to go down the calligraphic ancient path while the rest of the map was in the 21st or 22nd Century.
ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
The font and calligraphy tried to go down the calligraphic ancient path while the rest of the map was in the 21st or 22nd Century.
The font used for the territories and legend looks about the same to me between old and new, apart from being a little squashed vertically on the new. And, if by the "calligraphy" you mean the kanji text on the regions as a pattern, I don't see what makes it ancient. It's just Japanese to me. Do you know that these are ancient script forms and not modern?
the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
The font and calligraphy tried to go down the calligraphic ancient path while the rest of the map was in the 21st or 22nd Century.
The font used for the territories and legend looks about the same to me between old and new, apart from being a little squashed vertically on the new. And, if by the "calligraphy" you mean the kanji text on the regions as a pattern, I don't see what makes it ancient. It's just Japanese to me. Do you know that these are ancient script forms and not modern?
No, I meant the Riben, compass, and all the other fonts, as well. Though, now that you remind me that the pattern backgrounds were characters, not just tire treads, I suppose they add to that feel, too.
It's not a matter of what is from ancient times vs. modern times, it's the theme/feeling the aspects are trying to create. You want the map to mesh well via consistency. The old map was anything but consistent in its theme.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users