porkenbeans wrote:I noticed that the map image is an odd size, (623X600). In the example below, I just went ahead an squared things up. (so to speak). I added 23pxl to make it 623X623. The extra pxls. were added to the bottom of the map. This gave the opportunity to move things around a bit., and also do some re-scaling here and there.
The two things that I think need to be rescaled are the title and legend. Both suffer from the same thing. They are just to large in scale, and compete too much with the map itself. I had to do a lot of cutting and stretching, so the detail in the text has been severely compromised. But, it does show the scale and placement, of my suggestion.
The color filter overlay that I added, is not meant as a suggestion. Just thought it might give you something new to look at.
yeah well it is a slightly off size but if it took you this long to notice it why is it a problem? Also 623x623 is not an accepted size. 630x600 is the largest acceptable size for a small. It's just 23pxl skinnier than it needed to be because it didn't need to be. I do see you're point about the Title being to large though, and I can shrink that a bit, but like, do you have an opinion about the 4 new versions I posted? Does anyone?