Enigma wrote:i also think ohio should be 3 and not 4. the extra territory doesnt seem to deserve an extra army.
I agree with this, I think your formula is too heavily weighted towards number of territories that can attack. Having 6 territories that can attack you does not mean you will face 6 attacks. Giving it 66% as much as actual territories is not comparable to the effect it has on taking and holding a region in a real game. Ohio only barely got a score of 3.58, I think if the 6 attacking territories wasn't pushing that score up so much it would round down to 3.
Also, why is 4 Lakes only worth +2? For holding 4 out of 5, I think it should be +3.