Moderator: Cartographers
MrBenn wrote:It is the way of the world....
yeti_c wrote:Euch - you broke Bob, CM and the Drop Downs!!!
C.
InsomniaRed wrote:yeti_c wrote:Euch - you broke Bob, CM and the Drop Downs!!!
C.
Yes and it's making my brain hurt
yeti_c wrote:InsomniaRed wrote:yeti_c wrote:Euch - you broke Bob, CM and the Drop Downs!!!
C.
Yes and it's making my brain hurt
It shows in your picture!!
C.
InsomniaRed wrote:This is how I feel most times nowadays Benn's map is just making it better
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:InsomniaRed wrote:This is how I feel most times nowadays Benn's map is just making it better
You two seem to be in each others bubble alot lately.
Red and benn sitting in a tree...
MrBenn wrote:I'm wondering if 3 neutrals on each settlement is too high? I'm playing some tournament games on Arms Race, which has 2 armies on the neutrals... I'm wondering what others think about my proposal to reduce the settlements to 2 starting neutrals?
I interpreted that as "When holding the Settlement (named right before and explained after that), if you have both clans aswell you get 1 bonus autodeployed on the Settlement aswell as 1 extra army to deploy elsewhere."Capture both Shire CLANS, and the settlement and you will receive one bonus army.
Capture both Shire Clans and the settlement, and you will receive one bonus army.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users