Moderator: Community Team
MrBenn wrote:Or are you alluding to the fact that some of the ideas I mentioned earlier on the page have vanished? When I reviewed the spread of ranks, I thought I was trying to squueze too many in...
qwert wrote:Well these is only mine opinion.
Now you have -Lieutenant,Captain,Major,Colonel,brigadier,General and Fiel MArshall over 2000 players.
With these new Score counting you will get only 160 players with high ranks and you will Create hard to get General and Field Marshal rank(now you have one Field Marshal,5 generals,25 brigadier,82 colonel,over 400 major,over 500 Captain,and almost 1000 Lieutenant)and these number can be biger,but i repeat again that these is only mine opinion.
Given 22,000+ players, I think you made the point that the ranks are hard enough to reach already...
lancehoch wrote:If the change is implemented, what are the completed game requirements for each rank? Like how now you need 100 games to be a colonel. Any comments?
MrBenn wrote:I've spent a bit of time working on these; what do people think?
Blitzaholic wrote:MrBenn wrote:I've spent a bit of time working on these; what do people think?
this is much better than what we have, I like it
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:MrBenn wrote:I've spent a bit of time working on these; what do people think?
this is much better than what we have, I like it
I second that.
sensfan wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:MrBenn wrote:I've spent a bit of time working on these; what do people think?
this is much better than what we have, I like it
I second that.
Wonderful Wonderful!
I triple that.
e_i_pi wrote:sensfan wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:MrBenn wrote:I've spent a bit of time working on these; what do people think?
this is much better than what we have, I like it
I second that.
Wonderful Wonderful!
I triple that.
I fourth it
happy2seeyou wrote:I thought that the feather was a banana.
Scott-Land wrote:happy2seeyou wrote:I thought that the feather was a banana.
Not gonna say a word about your perversions H2.
Ohh btw- Qwert, if you're suggesting an overhaul why not get rid of the crown looking hat? Maybe have an actual Colonel insignia albeit you'd have to change the Brigadier one too.
MrBenn wrote:Scott-Land wrote:happy2seeyou wrote:I thought that the feather was a banana.
Not gonna say a word about your perversions H2.
Ohh btw- Qwert, if you're suggesting an overhaul why not get rid of the crown looking hat? Maybe have an actual Colonel insignia albeit you'd have to change the Brigadier one too.
Which Colonel insignia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonel#Gallery
FabledIntegral wrote:
Also I think anything below 900 should be a cook. There's no distinguishable difference between 900 points and less among players.
firth4eva wrote:Don't have a rank for people with 1 point. That will make people want to get it.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:firth4eva wrote:Don't have a rank for people with 1 point. That will make people want to get it.
That should be at 400, maybe 500.
FabledIntegral wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:firth4eva wrote:Don't have a rank for people with 1 point. That will make people want to get it.
That should be at 400, maybe 500.
Why? What possible reason can you fathom to do it? Rank 600 cook vs rank 400 cook, I sincerely doubt one is ANY better than the other.
Night Strike wrote:I like all these new ranks, except for the really low ones. Having really low ranks could encourage intentional deadbeating and throwing of games to achieve the distinction as being the "Only Conscientious Objector".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users