[ACC] The All Comers Cup - Final

by **Teflon Kris** on Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:47 pm

Let's go.

show: Rules Update

The clock is now ticking - MOWs have been PM'd and all team games should be created (and joined for home games) within 84 hours.

Away team games should be joined within 1 week (unless home game creation by oppoenents misses the deadline (whereby MOWs can contact me to request opponents games are created as random)).

8-)

Congrats to MM who have created their home team games already.

=D>

by **TheMissionary** on Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:52 pm

Well, what can we say...we've been ready.

by **Razorvich** on Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:55 am

Forwarded message from eddie2

eddie2 wrote:
ok i have read the aod gg challenge thread there are some major concerns regarding all of this.

player deadbeating a game.
ok poker club was a remade game but why here is the rule covering this.

Missed Turns in a No Spoils Game
Missed turns in no spoils will not be scrutinized or result in any penalty (it is very rare for an advantage to be gained).

and this.
Deadbeating
Deadbeating will not be considered to be a deliberate act unless evidence is provided to the contrary (e.g. evidence of the player turns being taken in other games when they could have taken place in the game in question). As with deliberate missed turns / 'time outs', the opposing team will be automatically awarded a victory for the game in question if strong evidence is proivided. .

now none of the above 2 happened. what was offered was a remake or the win. but the option should also of fallen into the missing of turns where no punishment was issued. but this was not offered.

the we come to the late issueing of games.
If deadlines are not met for creating games then the Tournament Organiser will create random games (escalating, chained, sunny) and randomly assign invites to the relevent clan members (but giving the opposition the time they would normally have been provided with - see above). Failure of clan members to accept invites at this stage (or accept then drop) will result in the game being awarded to the opposition.

now dj's excuse for not following his own rules was several clans were late in the issueing of these. at this exact moment in time the rule has not been changed. so why was the punishment not issued during the war. dj is a tourney mod and if this had of happened during a tourney the organiser would of been in trouble for inacurate details. aod have every right to be angry at djs running of this event and i feel clan directors should be looking at weather there should be medals awarded because this mtourney has not been run according to the rules.

by **Teflon Kris** on Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:09 am

show: Special Response for Eddie

by **Agent 86** on Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:24 pm

DJ, eddie2 is currently serving a forum ban..I understand. So he had one of his friend forward his message. Still I don't think it was really his area of concern. Now back to Round 3..gl all

86

by **eggrollonedolla** on Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:22 am

No predictions yet....interesting... :twisted:

by **Ickyketseddie** on Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:08 am

Probably because Half of the underdogs got through the last round!

See you in the final by the way!

by **The Voice** on Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:09 pm

eggrollonedolla wrote:No predictions yet....interesting...

I wouldn't be surprised to see MM vs. FOED in the finals. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised of much of anything lately.

by **QoH** on Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:15 pm

The Voice wrote:
eggrollonedolla wrote:No predictions yet....interesting...

I wouldn't be surprised to see MM vs. FOED in the finals. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised of much of anything lately.

I actually would put e-money on PIGS... of course, I have a good chance of losing my e-dollars. But I think they have what it takes to upset FOED. Then again, if they beat FOED, I think they'll win it all.

by **TheMissionary** on Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:29 pm

Round 4 Advancers
MM
LOW
LEG
FOED

by **padsta** on Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:34 pm

my predictions

MM
LOW
BOFM
PIGS (a little biased here though

)

by **joe snuffy** on Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:57 am

QoH wrote:
The Voice wrote:
eggrollonedolla wrote:No predictions yet....interesting...

I wouldn't be surprised to see MM vs. FOED in the finals. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised of much of anything lately.

I actually would put e-money on PIGS... of course, I have a good chance of losing my e-dollars. But I think they have what it takes to upset FOED. Then again, if they beat FOED, I think they'll win it all.

PIGS take all. Troof. I will agree, kind sir.

by **Teflon Kris** on Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:00 am

All games for the 3rd round have now been created,

Good luck to all

by **anonymus** on Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:01 am

DJ Teflon wrote:All games for the 3rd round have now been created,

Good luck to all

is it me who is a complete 'tard or is there no thread for our war? (or atleast no link to it)

/ :?:

by **Ickyketseddie** on Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:18 am

anonymus wrote:
DJ Teflon wrote:All games for the 3rd round have now been created,

Good luck to all

is it me who is a complete 'tard or is there no thread for our war? (or atleast no link to it)

/

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=441&t=156167

by **Nola_Lifer** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:28 am

Rules check. If a singles goes to 30 rounds then there is no winner for that game correct? So in which case someone could win the set 2-1?

by **Teflon Kris** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:44 am

Nola_Lifer wrote:Rules check. If a singles goes to 30 rounds then there is no winner for that game correct? So in which case someone could win the set 2-1?

Correctamundo sir - to be precise, the game is a draw if there is no result by the end of the 30th round (or 25th in team games).

by **Leehar** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:16 am

why not use round limits to make sure it's decided by then?

by **Nola_Lifer** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:04 am

Leehar wrote:why not use round limits to make sure it's decided by then?

There is round limits set on the games. I just wanted to make sure it was clear for 1v1's

by **jghost7** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:00 pm

There are no need for game deciding round limits. It is set in the rules where the games will be called a draw if not completed by the specified round. The game may proceed on and the winner may receive points but the results only count for the challenge if it is completed prior to stated round limits.

by **Leehar** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:43 pm

Which is complex as hell, so just institute round limits so the game is decided by that point instead of making them draws needlessly?

by **nippersean** on Fri Nov 11, 2011 6:03 pm

Leehar wrote:Which is complex as hell, so just institute round limits so the game is decided by that point instead of making them draws needlessly?

Shutup Leehar - if you find the simple rules "complex as hell" collect stamps. Are you actually in this compo??

by **TheMissionary** on Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:18 pm

MM defeats 1RFG

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=441&t=156034

by **stahrgazer** on Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:53 pm

Leehar wrote:Which is complex as hell, so just institute round limits so the game is decided by that point instead of making them draws needlessly?

Calling a draw is actually more fair than declaring a winner, depending on the setting used in the game. For example, by 30 rounds in an escalating game with higher spoils cashes, round 31 may reverse who was winning in round 30.

Regardless, I can't see how calling a draw vs. calling a winner makes this complex.