Rodion wrote:So, TSM got 4th (Chuuuuck) and 5th (Blitz). LoW got 5th (Chuuuuck) and 4th (Blitz).
Who's getting on top of the merger?
they both will be tied with 4.5 and in alphabetical order.
Moderator: Clan Directors
Rodion wrote:So, TSM got 4th (Chuuuuck) and 5th (Blitz). LoW got 5th (Chuuuuck) and 4th (Blitz).
Who's getting on top of the merger?
Leehar wrote:not really that much difference overall
reptile wrote:So which are you going to use for perception? the merged one?
qwert wrote:4,5
4,5
9,5
LOL , if you use ranking, you know that 4,5 place not exist-only
4
4
9
qwert wrote:correct placing will be
2010
1. Thota
2. Tofu
3. Kort
4. LoW
4. Tsm
6. IA
7. Empire
8. Dragoons
8. Nemesis
8 AoC
(next clan will be in 11th)
but maybe blits create new position system for ranking?
jpeter15 wrote:Why are we merging these two lists?
They are ranking very different things
1) Strength for the 2011 CCup
2) Who was the best in 2010
The Power Rankings were done by each clan
Blitz's rankings were done by select individuals arbitrarily chosen by Blitz and I'm not even sure if Blitz disclosed who all of them were (maybe he did, but it doesn't change much). Do these people really represent the CC community's perception?
This thread should either be open for all who want to vote on who had the best year in 2010 ranked 1-10 or it should change its title to "A Handful of Arbitrarily Chosen CC Members' Perception of TOP 10 CLANS by Years"
Leehar wrote:But since when has this ever been a ranking based on mathematical guidelines?
It should just basically be perceptions on where clans are based, and therefore exclusively placings?
ie low, tsm would be both 4th on the list, dragoons and nemesis 8th
reptile wrote:It is no secret that i like TSM as a clan and have always ranked them well. however this topic is Top 10 Clans by Years!
So technically if a clan is inactive in a year i dont see why they should even be on the list... for the same reason that they are not on a list before they exist... there is no history.
This is something i havent really understood.. it is a little off topic than the current debate, but something to consider.
Leehar wrote:
But since when has this ever been a ranking based on mathematical guidelines?
It should just basically be perceptions on where clans are based, and therefore exclusively placings?
ie low, tsm would be both 4th on the list, dragoons and nemesis 8th
Chariot of Fire wrote:Have to agree with JP & Rep here. The two lists were based on two different things.
There should be better clarity in future (e.g. "Best performing clans in 2012") because right now the way I see it Blitz's original list is really no different from a power ranking for the year 2011 (as opposed to a peformance ranking).
qwert wrote:Leehar wrote:
But since when has this ever been a ranking based on mathematical guidelines?
It should just basically be perceptions on where clans are based, and therefore exclusively placings?
ie low, tsm would be both 4th on the list, dragoons and nemesis 8th
Blitz,leehar and i tell same thing. ranking are one thing,and points are other thing, but good that you understand that and make position properly. If some clans have same number of points,then they hold same position, half position not exist in any competition.
Chariot of Fire wrote:Sure thing Blitz, thanks. Either myself, jpeter15 or Dako would be fine, as any one of us will put it the clan for discussion. Cheers
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:Sure but why not use the clan rankings we all just recently voted on?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users