Conquer Club

Merged: Terminator Deadbeats I

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Postby yorkiepeter on Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:29 am

AndyDufresne wrote:I don't think any player should receive any points from a terminator deadbeat...to me it goes against the whole idea of the game. I'd rather just see the deadbeater lose points, and have those points disappear from our whole pot-o-points. (Maybe this would help with inflation...lost points! ;))


--Andy


Do you mean that a deadbeats armies go neutral and so no active player would ever get the opportunity to terminate them? This is a backward step, it used to work like that before.

Or are you suggesting that any deadbeats armies not eliminated before the end of the game should cause the deadbeat to lose points? In theory this sounds fine but i suspect in practice you will just get the winner to corner his last opponent and keeping the game alive artificially while he kills the deadbeats
User avatar
Colonel yorkiepeter
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: Kendal, gateway to the English Lake District

Postby mightyredarmy on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:54 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:I don't think any player should receive any points from a terminator deadbeat...to me it goes against the whole idea of the game. I'd rather just see the deadbeater lose points, and have those points disappear from our whole pot-o-points. (Maybe this would help with inflation...lost points! ;))


--Andy


the problem with this is that I can get into a battle and use up armies early on against a player who I assume will see out the game...

...when he then deadbeats, (and lots of players deadbeat once they start losing, not all deadbeats quit on turn 1) bnot only have I wasted armies on him, but I would get no benefit although he may have quit because I have reduced him to a state where he has effectively given up. Meanwhile the player(s) I have not been actively fighting may have grown strong enough to take me out.

Surely the point of terminator is that you don't necessarily have to win (though that is ideal!), sometimes it's better to take points from the opponents you can to reduce your losses or hope for a net gain out of the game
Colonel mightyredarmy
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:35 am

Postby maniacmath17 on Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:42 am

AndyDufresne wrote:I don't think any player should receive any points from a terminator deadbeat...to me it goes against the whole idea of the game. I'd rather just see the deadbeater lose points, and have those points disappear from our whole pot-o-points. (Maybe this would help with inflation...lost points! ;))


--Andy


Agreed, anything we can do to stop point inflation would be great.

Looking at the scoreboard earlier, I noticed that if you eliminate new recruits from the scoreboard, about 90% of all players are above 1000 points.
show: Top Secret


2006-10-25 21:16:00 - NUKE: wtf it says dminus got 2 troops for holding oceania what is that lol
User avatar
Brigadier maniacmath17
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:32 pm

Postby Ishiro on Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:55 am

Point inflation can't be stopped... every time a new player joins, 1000 points are added to the pot.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Ishiro
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: Under the Rainbow

Postby treefiddy on Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:06 am

lackattack wrote:Deadbeat points should be given to the last remaining active player
The downside is that this isn't very terminator-ish.


This is my favorite option. I do not like the all armies to neutral that you suggested after, though. Here are some benefits/explaination to causing deadbeats to lose points at the end, without changing anything else.

- All other players still have an option to eliminate the deadbeat player for points. Like someone else mentioned, part of Terminator is that even if you are weak you can save points by taking a weaker opponent out.

- The cards are still active. This creates a scenario that eliminates the complete neglect for a deadbeat player.

- Deadbeating can be looked at as a surrender. No matter how many people on the map, it's a world war to the end. Anyone surrendering would basically be surrendering to the world super power (whoever wins the game).

Some people say that a change would defeat the purpose of Terminator. I feel that the purpose of Terminator still holds it's true value if this change is made. Players who do not deadbeat can still eliminate people (and even deadbeats) to gain their points and cards. The entire purpose of Terminator is still there, the only difference is that at the end, any deadbeats are considered terminated by the winning person.

Another option would be to just penalize the last remaining active player who deadbeats by considering him terminated by the winner. But as Yorkie said, that would just lead to more people dragging out games so they can finish off every person. Imagine being a freebie who's sitting there with 1 army while someone else finishes off their turn. Especially bad if it's a once a day player doing it.

I do not like the points lost to neutral idea. People like to feel like they accomplished something (hence the complaints about terminator points). Point inflation is a good thing because it allows for any new recruit to have a gob of points to advance in rank. Advancement breeds a sense of fun; and is more conducive to keeping people around and making them want to play. It's not like points can be used to purchase anything, so there really is no harm in allowing it to inflate.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class treefiddy
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 11:37 am

Terminator Deadbeat solution

Postby gimil on Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:33 am

<Subject>:

* A compromise on the terminator deadbeat "loophole"


<Body>:

* Suggestion Idea: Introducing a system where any deadbeat in a terminator game loses his points, even if they deadbeat

* Specifics: Once a player deadbeats they should lose points to each player that is still active in a game. The usual formula should still be applied

(losers score/winners score)*20

but only give each player half of what they would get if they terminated that player.

* Why it is needed: lately terminator has came under alot of fire for its "loopholes" this suggestion would give no advantage to dead beating in a terminator and also not award any other player to highly as they didn't terminate that player.

priority: 3-4
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby gimil on Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:47 am

why was my terminator suggestion merged?
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby lackattack on Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:19 pm

gimil wrote:why was my terminator suggestion merged?


To keep all terminator deadbeat solutions in 1 place. I'm not a fan of your solution, giving the points to all other players; it gives points to people who didn't do anything to earn them.

I find myself swayed by treefiddy's reasoning. His solution (keep deadbeat armies in the game and deadbeat points go to last man standing) makes sense. It's kinda like fast-forwarding through the end-game.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class lackattack
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Postby gimil on Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:00 pm

lol ok fair enuff. I just thought it was a reason to drown out my suggestion :wink:
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Terminator deadbeaters

Postby Crazy_Ivan on Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:34 am

At the moment, if a game of Terminator comes down to two players, if one player misses three turns, the game is over but no points are awarded to the other player (eg game 842842). This means if players think that they will not win, but their opponent cannot win in three turns, it encourages them to deadbeat. Simple solution - in these circumstances, deadbeaters lose points to the other player...
User avatar
Major Crazy_Ivan
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:50 am
Location: London

Re: Terminator deadbeaters

Postby DiM on Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:52 am

Crazy_Ivan wrote:At the moment, if a game of Terminator comes down to two players, if one player misses three turns, the game is over but no points are awarded to the other player (eg game 842842). This means if players think that they will not win, but their opponent cannot win in three turns, it encourages them to deadbeat. Simple solution - in these circumstances, deadbeaters lose points to the other player...


this has been proposed several times.

also this improvement could help speed up some annoying games where 1 guy is pinned down to just one terit and the strong guy takes his time to wipe the board of the deadbeats. i've done this and to be honest i felt sorry for the pinned guy especially if he was non premium.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby Crazy_Ivan on Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:55 am

yep, guess I will just pin a guy next time, but a long old process, esp if not a speed game
User avatar
Major Crazy_Ivan
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:50 am
Location: London

Postby lackattack on Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:42 pm

Please use the search feature next time. The place for terminator deadbeat discussion is here:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16653
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class lackattack
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Previous

Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users