Moderator: Community Team
jiminski wrote:thank you Wicked, that is very fair.
i'll formulate some coherent conversation (if i can) tomorrow; the last few pages were derailed a touch.
Owen had a good point regarding how to deal with non English comments so i may start there.. when it's not 2 am.
wicked wrote:This is an *international* website, which we support and promote with the international forums. Comments about feedback have always been allowed in any languange, as has everything here.
wicked wrote:If there was a complaint, we got a translation. Most people only left feedback in another language to someone who spoke that same language.
hulmey wrote:wicked wrote:This is an *international* website, which we support and promote with the international forums. Comments about feedback have always been allowed in any languange, as has everything here.
Have you ever received feedback in another language and asked to moderate on it? Poker companies are international and only allow chat in english on their products. You abuse this rule and you lose you chat priv's. Arent they more international than CC??
How did CC moderate feedback in another language before?
foxx omok - is a very bad maltese word. How can you moderate that without having employed staff?
jiminski wrote:wicked wrote:If there was a complaint, we got a translation. Most people only left feedback in another language to someone who spoke that same language.
that makes sense... not much point leaving a scathing tirade if the recipient can't understand it.
So the complainant who also spoke the language made the translation, Wicked?
PLAYER57832 wrote:hulmey wrote:wicked wrote:This is an *international* website, which we support and promote with the international forums. Comments about feedback have always been allowed in any languange, as has everything here.
Have you ever received feedback in another language and asked to moderate on it? Poker companies are international and only allow chat in english on their products. You abuse this rule and you lose you chat priv's. Arent they more international than CC??
How did CC moderate feedback in another language before?
foxx omok - is a very bad maltese word. How can you moderate that without having employed staff?
The only time I have seen feedback in another language is when both speakers speak that language. I believe I did so at least once, though I also wrote in English. Among other things, it was a quick way to signal that this person does speak another language (they spoke English, too).
One of the things I really like is the chance to speak a not so common language. I live in a small community and don't often get the chance. Here, I can.
HOWEVER, this does bring up a point ... I would like to see some mention in the profile of various languages and a simple fluent/ not fluent or "does not speak English". I know this causes some people to avoid others. But, in this case, I suspect that anyone who really dislikes speaking with non English speakers is probably someone those folks would just as soon avoid.
(other than in team games, that is. In team games, communication is quite important).
jiminski wrote:Concise description:
- Running alongside the rating system, allow users to write a comment (in a similar way to the old system.)
The option would be given at the end of a game.
Once the comment is completed, the text is forwarded to the recipient User for approval.
if they do not approve, the comment automatically goes to either an Open Forum or Special Usergroup for adjudication (*see below for 'Forum' Description)
Specifics:
- The proposal gives ability, to all users, to add a comment at the end of a game.
They have 24 hours to make comment on any game/player (with game-link if it regards a specific game)
This can be anything:
- Skill and tactics
- It could be a friendly piece of prose for mutual enjoyment!
The Comment is then made available to the recipient for approval prior to it being logged into their profile. They have 5 days to say āyesā or ānoā. If they fail to vote the comment will be entered into their profile.
In special cases, live Comments can be taken back to the Forum for adjudication; to cover people going away and missing the right to veto.
If they say āyesā, they have approved the comment and it will also be logged into their profile.
If they say ānoā, not approved, the Comment goes for arbitration by the Site in the Contentious Comment Forum. (The rules of approval need to be worked out but will mainly cover outright spiteful lies and abusive language!)
Arbitration is made by CC members: the make-up and remit of which is to be discussed;
It could be
A) Open to all members, with a pre-forum link to the Moderation 'Forum', on the Front page after login. This will encourage those who do not normally visit the Forums to participate! *
or
B) Closed select group of non-mod volunteers
Why will this work where the other failed?
- The proposed system does not affect your Pos or Neg Rating, so it will be less contentious.
- The recipient gets immediate right to take contentious Comments to the Community for adjudication of fairness and suitability, before anyone else sees it in their Profile.
- If the Comments are judged by the whole site (with say 100 votes giving a judgement on 95% agreement**) on a casual anonymous basis, there is no one to shout at, no focal figure to hate.
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
- Gives opportunity to write creative, fun prose
- Allows for people to comment on a persons Skill and be more specific about the experience
- Could be integrated with the old style system to placate the dissenters, without the site having to commit people and resources
*This is participatory Forum but with anonymous perusal and voting only. The comment Forum is 'ironically' not a place for discussion by the voters.
So there will be no canvassing for support or bitching, it is simply a place to read and click 'yes' or 'no'.
**A ceiling of votes needed to constitute an authoritative decision! For example, we could set the limit at 100 votes with 95% approval to make it a live comment.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
alstergren wrote:jiminski wrote:Concise description:
- Running alongside the rating system, allow users to write a comment (in a similar way to the old system.)
The option would be given at the end of a game.
Once the comment is completed, the text is forwarded to the recipient User for approval.
if they do not approve, the comment automatically goes to either an Open Forum or Special Usergroup for adjudication (*see below for 'Forum' Description)
Specifics:
- The proposal gives ability, to all users, to add a comment at the end of a game.
They have 24 hours to make comment on any game/player (with game-link if it regards a specific game)
This can be anything:
- Skill and tactics
- It could be a friendly piece of prose for mutual enjoyment!
The Comment is then made available to the recipient for approval prior to it being logged into their profile. They have 5 days to say āyesā or ānoā. If they fail to vote the comment will be entered into their profile.
In special cases, live Comments can be taken back to the Forum for adjudication; to cover people going away and missing the right to veto.
If they say āyesā, they have approved the comment and it will also be logged into their profile.
If they say ānoā, not approved, the Comment goes for arbitration by the Site in the Contentious Comment Forum. (The rules of approval need to be worked out but will mainly cover outright spiteful lies and abusive language!)
Arbitration is made by CC members: the make-up and remit of which is to be discussed;
It could be
A) Open to all members, with a pre-forum link to the Moderation 'Forum', on the Front page after login. This will encourage those who do not normally visit the Forums to participate! *
or
B) Closed select group of non-mod volunteers
Why will this work where the other failed?
- The proposed system does not affect your Pos or Neg Rating, so it will be less contentious.
- The recipient gets immediate right to take contentious Comments to the Community for adjudication of fairness and suitability, before anyone else sees it in their Profile.
- If the Comments are judged by the whole site (with say 100 votes giving a judgement on 95% agreement**) on a casual anonymous basis, there is no one to shout at, no focal figure to hate.
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
- Gives opportunity to write creative, fun prose
- Allows for people to comment on a persons Skill and be more specific about the experience
- Could be integrated with the old style system to placate the dissenters, without the site having to commit people and resources
*This is participatory Forum but with anonymous perusal and voting only. The comment Forum is 'ironically' not a place for discussion by the voters.
So there will be no canvassing for support or bitching, it is simply a place to read and click 'yes' or 'no'.
**A ceiling of votes needed to constitute an authoritative decision! For example, we could set the limit at 100 votes with 95% approval to make it a live comment.
I believe you have too much time on your hands... Why don't you just join a few games instead?
alstergren wrote:I believe you have too much time on your hands... Why don't you just join a few games instead?
KLOBBER wrote:alstergren wrote:I believe you have too much time on your hands... Why don't you just join a few games instead?
:::High Five:::
KLOBBER wrote:::yawn::
I don't know why, but anger issues and lies bore me.
KLOBBER wrote:::yawn::
Elimination Summary
2008-06-09 13:17:21 - spearce was kicked out for missing too many turns in round - 3
2008-06-10 13:17:21 - catchat4 was kicked out for missing too many turns in round - 3
2008-06-11 13:17:21 - Norris was kicked out for missing too many turns in round - 3
2008-06-12 13:17:21 - xufan1089 was kicked out for missing too many turns in round - 3
2008-06-14 13:06:45 - fireburnscold was kicked out for missing too many turns in round - 3
Game Chat
2008-06-13 15:52:44 - KLOBBER: By the way, I am in the habit of rating all members with all 5's. : )
KLOBBER wrote:I happy.. talk me.. Klobber *bANG*.. *YAWN* sleepy-sleep now
homes32 wrote:so where are we standing now Jim?
jiminski wrote:...everyone is bored already?
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users