A revised foe list for ppl who join games with foes in them

[KoE_Sirius]

Another thought that has been brought up is that shouldnt the player who opened the game dictate who is or isn't allowed in his game.http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=55349
Just because a player is second to join and has an extensive foes list makes a speed game impossible to start.

Hmmm - I'm not sure about this...

If I get invited to join a game - and I join it - I still don't want to play with someone on my ignore list - regardless of whether or not the game maker likes them.

C.

If I invite you into my game.You do not tell me who I can or can not played in the real world..What makes CC ANY DIFFERENT ?
Next you'll be telling me who I can have round for dinner..Where do we draw the line._____________________________- You walk in to my Arena.I'd like you to play by my rules...Not yours..PFFFT

[PLAYER57832]

Another thought that has been brought up is that shouldnt the player who opened the game dictate who is or isn't allowed in his game.http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=55349
Just because a player is second to join and has an extensive foes list makes a speed game impossible to start.

Hmmm - I'm not sure about this...

If I get invited to join a game - and I join it - I still don't want to play with someone on my ignore list - regardless of whether or not the game maker likes them.

C.

If I invite you into my game.You do not tell me who I can or can not played in the real world..What makes CC ANY DIFFERENT ?
Next you'll be telling me who I can have round for dinner..Where do we draw the line._____________________________- You walk in to my Arena.I'd like you to play by my rules...Not yours..PFFFT

You get to define private games, not public ones ... that definition was set by CC.

As for the "just scroll up" re bad attitudes..

It really depends. Ignoring chat is a good way to miss stuff in a multiple player game.

And, I plain should not have to. If you want to be a jerk, sorry I am not going to deal with you PERIOD. This is my FUN time, not my "deal with jerks time".

[KoE_Sirius]

Another thought that has been brought up is that shouldnt the player who opened the game dictate who is or isn't allowed in his game.http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=55349
Just because a player is second to join and has an extensive foes list makes a speed game impossible to start.

Hmmm - I'm not sure about this...

If I get invited to join a game - and I join it - I still don't want to play with someone on my ignore list - regardless of whether or not the game maker likes them.

C.

If I invite you into my game.You do not tell me who I can or can not played in the real world..What makes CC ANY DIFFERENT ?
Next you'll be telling me who I can have round for dinner..Where do we draw the line._____________________________- You walk in to my Arena.I'd like you to play by my rules...Not yours..PFFFT

You get to define private games, not public ones ... that definition was set by CC.

As for the "just scroll up" re bad attitudes..

It really depends. Ignoring chat is a good way to miss stuff in a multiple player game.

And, I plain should not have to. If you want to be a jerk, sorry I am not going to deal with you PERIOD. This is my FUN time, not my "deal with jerks time".

Yeti used the word invited..I assumed he meant a private game.I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
If I invited someone to one of my private games.They would be well mannered in the past or they wouldnt be there.Sometimes tempers flare when one feels passionate about a game.We always make up afterwards.
I'm also sorry you think I am a jerk.Sometimes people just go on and on about a subject and it just gets old.
Lets see what the mods think and we can go from there.I have nothing more to add.

[cicero]

WOAH ... misunderstanding alert !
Hoping I can help ...

Sirius, I've snipped out the two oldest quotes from the conversation below just for brevity.
Look at your initial use of the word "you" ... I'm 100% sure you're not referring to the previous poster there but rather you're referring in general to "some example CC player" ...
In the same way I am 100% sure that PLAYER57832 is not referring to you, but to "some example CC player" ...

If I invite you into my game. You do not tell me who I can or can not played in the real world..What makes CC ANY DIFFERENT ?
Next you'll be telling me who I can have round for dinner..Where do we draw the line._____________________________- You walk in to my Arena.I'd like you to play by my rules...Not yours..PFFFT

You get to define private games, not public ones ... that definition was set by CC.

As for the "just scroll up" re bad attitudes..

It really depends. Ignoring chat is a good way to miss stuff in a multiple player game.

And, I plain should not have to. If you want to be a jerk, sorry I am not going to deal with you PERIOD. This is my FUN time, not my "deal with jerks time".

Yeti used the word invited..I assumed he meant a private game.I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
If I invited someone to one of my private games.They would be well mannered in the past or they wouldnt be there.Sometimes tempers flare when one feels passionate about a game.We always make up afterwards.
I'm also sorry you think I am a jerk.Sometimes people just go on and on about a subject and it just gets old.
Lets see what the mods think and we can go from there.I have nothing more to add.

... consequently I'm 100% sure that you've misunderstood PLAYER in your underlined section ...


This is an interesting thread and you've certainly got me thinking ...

PLAYER's post - which you quoted and applauded at the top of page 7 - is, I think, the current summary of the state of the suggestion and it's variations?
Do you think it'd be useful to use it to update the first post - to clearly set out the different ideas - and set up a poll ?

Anyway, back to you guys ...

[PLAYER57832]

I definitely do not accuse anyone in this thread of being a "jerk".

I did not realize you were talking specifically about private games. I have been keeping up on the threads, but apparently I missed something.

If you are talking about other people having issues with each other, so many that you cannot fill games if either joins you (that is, A hates B-T and Z hates F-Q, if they jong, there are not that many folks left to play), then I don't really know what the answer is.

[Assassin07]

that kinda is unfair like if u dont like the person so u put them on u foe list then they have a good game so u join i dont think its fair

[Assassin07]

and i think u should stop fighting

[PLAYER57832]

Just to clarify further.

I HAVE said that if you feel too many people have you on their lists, then you might want to consider whether your previous actions could be a cause. (you might consider, not me) That's just general. It's always best to see if we are causing problems before trying to get others to fix them.

But it seems what you are talking about now is others who have too many folks on their lists making it hard for you to fill games (that is, if A hates B-J and Z hates K-W, there are not many people left) .. and specifically in private speed games?

In that case, a temporary suspension of the foe list might work ... but that is suggested in another thread already.

And I think this thread already did come up with a good idea.... namely that if you put someone on your foe list, you cannot join their games (except tournaments and Battle Royales).

I do have a couple of other ideas now, but will bring them up in discussion. They need "rounding out".

[KoE_Sirius]

Just to clarify further.

I HAVE said that if you feel too many people have you on their lists, then you might want to consider whether your previous actions could be a cause. (you might consider, not me) That's just general. It's always best to see if we are causing problems before trying to get others to fix them.

But it seems what you are talking about now is others who have too many folks on their lists making it hard for you to fill games (that is, if A hates B-J and Z hates K-W, there are not many people left) .. and specifically in private speed games?

In that case, a temporary suspension of the foe list might work ... but that is suggested in another thread already.

And I think this thread already did come up with a good idea.... namely that if you put someone on your foe list, you cannot join their games (except tournaments and Battle Royales).

I do have a couple of other ideas now, but will bring them up in discussion. They need "rounding out".

I am on 2 foe lists that are of any consequence to me.If I am on anymore I do not really know as these people play a different game format to me.
I did have a lot of people foe'd,because when I started playing AoR2 I was so good at it some players(15 or 20) would just go for me,because that was the only way they could win.
Since most of the players on cc have learned the map now.I removed them all and slowly asked them to take me off thier lists.If I had not of asked I would still be there even though they joined lots of my games .Once again what concerns me is that if the second,third or fourth join my public game and have an extensive foe list the game will never start.

[KoE_Sirius]

For the record.I think everyone on cc are the bomb.No jerks here I know of
Let the voting begin.

[PLAYER57832]

You left off the suggestion most people preferred and left in the one most folks rejected several pages back.

Folks don't want foes automatically removed, they just want to know when they join a foes game

OR, (the preferred option) They wanted the foe list to go both ways -- if you put someone on, they cannot join your games AND you cannot join theirs, with the exception of tournaments and Battle Royals.

[Ditocoaf]

Yes... there needs to be an option that "You cannot join games that your Foe is in". That's what I vote for.

[KoE_Sirius]

Yes... there needs to be an option that "You cannot join games that your Foe is in". That's what I vote for.

done...you'll all need to revote now though.I didnt realise that when I put the extra answer in.

[KLOBBER]

This poll is inaccurate to the details of this thread. It does not include all the options that we discussed here.

How about we scrap this one and have someone with a higher IQ put together a polll on this subject?

[Anarkistsdream]

This poll is inaccurate to the details of this thread. It does not include all the options that we discussed here.

How about we scrap this one and have someone with a higher IQ put together a polll on this subject?

Troll alert.

[KoE_Sirius]

This poll is inaccurate to the details of this thread. It does not include all the options that we discussed here.

How about we scrap this one and have someone with a higher IQ put together a polll on this subject?

As the subject is aimed at speed gamers .You only played 2 speed games and lost both.Why don't you troll another subject and keep you nose out of this one ?

[KLOBBER]

I'm not trolling, I'm a paying member, and this issue affects all members.

Your poll is incomplete. Someone with a brain needs to fix it.

[KoE_Sirius]

I'm not trolling, I'm a paying member, and this issue effects all members.

Your poll is incomplete. Someone with a brain needs to fix it.

The Poll is perfect..Go and bother billy goat gruff.

[KLOBBER]

The poll is perfect to a crippled mind, but in reality, it does not represent all the ideas that have been suggested in this thread.

Who told the chimp to make a poll?

[KoE_Sirius]

I tell you what klobber.Why don't you tell me what you would like to be an option in the answers instead of being so obtuse.
Someone with such a high IQ would explore that avenue to begin with I would have thought.

[KLOBBER]

That's your responsibility, not mine.

[KoE_Sirius]

That's your responsibility, not mine.

Well like I said.I like it the way it is.
Happy Days then

[Anarkistsdream]

I'm not trolling, I'm a paying member, and this issue effects all members.

Your poll is incomplete. Someone with a brain needs to fix it.

AFFECT... Not effect...

Again, please troll elsewhere... You want to criticize other peoples intelligence when you have none of your own.

[KLOBBER]

I'm not trolling, I'm a paying member, and this issue effects all members.

Your poll is incomplete. Someone with a brain needs to fix it.

AFFECT... Not effect...

Again, please troll elsewhere... You want to criticize other peoples intelligence when you have none of your own.

AFFECTS, not affect. Also, your final ellipse is missing a period; it should have four, not three.

Is this going to be about my one typo and your three grammatical errors, or about the incomplete and therefore irrelevant poll?

[KoE_Sirius]

60% on the last option so far.
Looking good.