owenshooter wrote:agree 100% with every word of Night Strike's post. period.
*Rereads the post twice in bewilderment.*
p.p.s.-threw this one in for Night Strike...

You would.
porkenbeans wrote:The mods have circled the wagons, and gone into "us against them" mode. There last manifesto only accomplished to confuse the forum rules more. Annoying is very ambiguous. It may be used in an arbitrary manner. Especially in this "us against them" atmosphere.
The locking of threads for no justifiable cause, is the kind of thing that I am talking about.
I don't get what you're saying here. Everyone on Team CC participates to help the community in some fashion. The only cases of "us against them" would be "us against the loud minority of trolls". Every day there are moderators helping train cooks, developing maps, running tournaments, answering questions, greeting chatters, and organizing the forum. Believe it or not, we are part of the Team because we want to
help the site; we aren't out to purposefully harm it.
King herps' sig. says "come get raped". And when I call him a "Newbie Raper", I get called out by a Mod and told that I can not say that. Then they lock my thread and some others" threads.
Geez, you're making a huge deal out of something trivial. Your thread got locked and you received a
friendly warning. If you read the Community Guidelines, you would notice that those two actions are very low on the severity continuum and are meant to just make sure everything stays kosher.
It seems that they are siding with the N.F.s'. in complete contrast with Lacks proclamation. It is as if there solution to the problem is to simply admit that there is a problem with the leaderboard. Well it took us long enough to get them to admit that. But that is only the beginning. You cant simply stop there and claim "problem fixed".
You must now adjust the leaderboard accordingly. some at the top have inflated their scores so much that it is just not fair for the rest of the CC members that are not "Harvesters".
Personally, I do not think that they should be busted down to cook, But, 2 or 3 ranks would be an acceptable compromise. If they are that good, it would take them no time to regain their place at the top. If they are not, They will just have to settle for their true ranking.
Porkenbeans, did you
actually read the announcement from lack??? There is a
VERY clear statement in the announcement that you really should read and understand:
Members who continue this practice will receive point resets and then progressively longer website bans.
PLEASE take note of the word
continue. This means that if people keep farming new recruits, THEN they will receive disciplinary measures.
They will not receive point resets for farming that took place prior to this announcement.Now, if you would like to continue discussing your
incorrect interpretation of the farming rule, please do so in the appropriate announcement thread. I believe you started this thread to discuss hiring an impartial overseer.