Medal Discussions and Index of Medal Suggestions

[TheForgivenOne]

I have Merged about 10 different Medal idea's into this thread

[TheForgivenOne]

Okay, after i have some time, i'm going to pull all the ideas into the first post

[TheForgivenOne]

Okay, these are the ones being discussed in here.

Fog of War Achievement
Platinum Medal
Tournament Champion
Total Wins
Win Percentage
Unique Map Achievement
Endurance
Cards Achievement
Score Plateau
Battle Royal Recognition
Platinum & Diamond Medal Levels
Split Medals page to list each level separately
Length of Activity on Site
Freestyle Achievement
Consecutive Victories

I will start a poll, and you guys vote for which ones you'd like to see. You can see a description via a link to each one in the Second Post

[army of nobunaga]

thanx man.. you are kicking ass.

[TheForgivenOne]

Alright, poll is up. But PLEASE, only vote for the ones you like. Don't vote for each one just to get more medals

[Qwert]

i think that these very importan topic, lost efectives,if mods not stikied these topic

[TheForgivenOne]

Hm, i like your thinking qwert. I am going to permanently sticky this thread. This won't mean that this is on the famous "last call", but it will give a place for people who have medal suggestions.

[greenoaks]

As for the other suggestions, I do not like the medals for:

Total Wins - that info is on our profile and favours 1v1 game players

Win % - that info is on our profile and favours 1v1 game players

Length of Activity on Site - that info is on our profile & posts and is not available to all/majority of players

Consecutive Victories - favours 1v1 game players and those who only play 1 game at a time

Score Plateau - that info belongs on our Profile page @ User Statistics as Highest Score & Rank Achieved right before/after the info on number of posts and most active forum/topic

Battle Royale - isn't that already covered by the Tournament Victory medal. i don't see how a win here is any more important than some of the other enormous tournaments won by other players

Endurance - that info is on our profile and favours 1v1 game players


I am in favour of:

Platinum Medal - see earlier post
Diamond Medal - see earlier post
Unique Map Achievement - i would really like to see Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum unique defeats available for each map, regardless of Fog/No Fog, Freestyle/Sequential, Spoils/No Spoils, etc. it would promote all maps far beyond what the cross-maps medal does


I am not in favour of Cards Achievement but if we have Nuclear then we should also have it for the other forms of Spoils

[squishyg]

My votes are for Total Wins, Unique Map Achievement, and Cards Achievement. I love earning medals in new categories. I agree that once you earn a medal, you should keep the medal.

[greenoaks]

if you want more medals then we need different Spoils and different Reinforcements

[Darwins_Bane]

Due to the fact that this thread has reached a general conclusion to the suggestion, I'm going to move this to submitted.

[Blitzaholic]

Official List
*Each title is linked to the post where it was proposed.

• Platinum Medal
• Total Wins
• Win Percentage
• Unique Map Achievement
• Endurance
• Cards Achievement
• Score Plateau
• Battle Royal Recognition
• Platinum & Diamond Medal Levels
• Split Medals page to list each level separately
• Length of Activity on Site
• Consecutive Victories

thanks for suggesting this NS, however, it has been almost 3 years? Can they add a few now, and more later?

Maybe add the top 3 to 5 votes by poll now, and review others later?

[Natascha]

More new medals:

- for most times conqueror
- for the longest time conqueror......
- for the longest time map not in beta
- for the most posts
- for the most unique defeats

Blitz will get them all, can the system handle 4 digits if he reach 1000 medals?

[ljex]

Platinum Medal - what limit would this be set at?
Total Wins - as long as it is not too excessive i would be a supporter. Currently there are only 250 ish players active with more than 2500 wins so if this was say 5000 wins needed to get gold i would not be a fan. yes there are some cc addicts but i would rather medals be attainable for the average person.
Win Percentage - If this is pure win percentage. this is dumb i would never be a supporter unless it accounted for 8 player singles games and other game types like that.
Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals
Endurance - plain dumb
Cards Achievement - escalating/flat rate/no spoils? if so lack has made it clear he wants medals to be for types of games people do not play often
Score Plateau - interesting what are score requirements suggested for gold/silver/bronze if not too high i would support it but we need to remember the common player in these medals
Battle Royal Recognition - like this one
Diamond Medal - lets get platinum first
Length of Activity on Site - dumb just like endurance medal, requires no skill just dedication
Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

[Blitzaholic]

is this thread active or not NS?

I do not think the CC community should be ignored, this has almost been 3 years now?????


Perhaps another mod, maybe ljex or someone can look into this and keep it active. There may be a few ideas here, that could be added, seems like a fair amount agree, who is going to take responsibility for looking after this?

If you think they are all no good, then LOCK it, if not, lets put it in an active forum.


Thx

[Qwert]

Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals

no wrong-these is achivement on one specific(unique map)

unique map Achievement
Awarded to members that won X time in one unique map,defeating 2 unique oponent per game.
bronze 50 win
silver 100 win
gold 400 win

Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

hard to farm,because you have rule to apply. Well ofcourse its will hard,its all ready hard for me, but for change some medals need to be hard for achivement.

Consecutive Victory Achievement
Awarded to members that have X victories consecutively,defeat two unique opponents on each of X maps.
Bronze-20 victories
silver-50 victories
gold-100 victories

For bronze you need to win 20 games, and to defeate 40 unique opponents, for gold 100 victories and 200 unique opponents(distributed to 2 unique opponets per one win minimum)
ofcourse its possibile to cheat for these medal,but you need to have large numebr of players who will participiate in cheat.

[trapyoung]

Why is there not an option to add no additional medals? You start handing the shit out like toilet paper, they start to mean nothing. Seriously, up the limits for silver & gold and create some higher standards for tournament games - I don't see what the problem is, clan medals upped the norm from what clans had previously conducted wars on, why not ratchet up everything else. Seems like people want medals for just existing, seems stupid to me.

[ljex]

Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals

no wrong-these is achivement on one specific(unique map)

unique map Achievement
Awarded to members that won X time in one unique map,defeating 2 unique oponent per game.
bronze 50 win
silver 100 win
gold 400 win

Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

hard to farm,because you have rule to apply. Well ofcourse its will hard,its all ready hard for me, but for change some medals need to be hard for achivement.

Consecutive Victory Achievement
Awarded to members that have X victories consecutively,defeat two unique opponents on each of X maps.
Bronze-20 victories
silver-50 victories
gold-100 victories

For bronze you need to win 20 games, and to defeate 40 unique opponents, for gold 100 victories and 200 unique opponents(distributed to 2 unique opponets per one win minimum)
ofcourse its possibile to cheat for these medal,but you need to have large numebr of players who will participiate in cheat.

if this is the case then i would not be a fan of either of these medals implemented

[Qwert]

what? so you are for easy get medals? now im confused

[Commander62890]

Platinum Medal - what limit would this be set at?

Looks like it's for the player who won the most games in each gametype. Only 1 winner for each setting.
This could be all right, but I'm going to hold off for now. If the player gets surpassed in wins, they don't lose the medal, do they? But the player who passes them gets a medal? And what if the original player gains the lead again? I just have too many questions here to vote Yes for it.

Total Wins - as long as it is not too excessive i would be a supporter. Currently there are only 250 ish players active with more than 2500 wins so if this was say 5000 wins needed to get gold i would not be a fan. yes there are some cc addicts but i would rather medals be attainable for the average person.

I agree with that. 5000 is too high. Even if it was 2500, it would still be a tough call - not sure I love this being a medal.
But as it stands, it is an easy choice. No for 5000.

Win Percentage - If this is pure win percentage. this is dumb i would never be a supporter unless it accounted for 8 player singles games and other game types like that.

Definitely not voting for this. Win percentage is a bad statistic, and I doubt it would be feasible to account for the size of the game.

Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals

This is interesting. "Awarded to members that won X time in one unique map,defeating 2 unique oponent per game." - So 1v1s don't count?
Kind of a cool medal; you could see which maps players have played a lot. Seems incredibly difficult to reach 400...
I don't know; it's a tough call. I'm gonna say No for now.

Endurance - plain dumb

Meh. No thanks.

Cards Achievement - escalating/flat rate/no spoils? if so lack has made it clear he wants medals to be for types of games people do not play often

I love this one, but I'm sure Lack won't do it. Still, I'll vote Yes.

Score Plateau - interesting what are score requirements suggested for gold/silver/bronze if not too high i would support it but we need to remember the common player in these medals

I like this. You know what, Ljex? I think the idea that medals must be attainable by the common player isn't so great. I think it's good to reward the stellar players and be able to identify them easily. I may have to rethink the "5000 games won" suggestion... but for now, I'll vote No on that and Yes on this.

Battle Royal Recognition - like this one

1 win for 1 medal? All right... sure. Voting Yes.

Diamond Medal - lets get platinum first

Voting Yes

Length of Activity on Site - dumb just like endurance medal, requires no skill just dedication

I agree with Ljex... No.

Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

It encourages 1v1 and team game farming, so definitely No.



So, I'm voting Yes for Cards Achievement, Score Plateau, Battle Royale Recognition, and Diamond Medal.

Although I think that the number for Score Plateau should be revisited.

I don't love the 3000 - Bronze, 4000 - Silver, 5000 - Gold

Why can't we just give a medal for reaching 1800, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000?

How sick would that be? If you reached 6000, you get 10 medals. Completely fine with me - score is a big part of CC, regardless of whether or not it shows if you are a good player. I love the idea of score having a big impact on medals. And having a system like mine would really show you how high a player got.

Maybe you thought a player reached Colonel, but when you checked his medals, you see that he only reached Major, and never got Colonel.

What do you think about this tweaking? I really think it's better than just having 3000, 4000, 5000.

[greenoaks]

has consecutive turns taken been suggested ?

[Qwert]

consecutive turns taken?

[TheForgivenOne]

Merged

[greenoaks]

can a mod remove Battle Royal from the poll as it is now recognised.

If there was a Platinum Medal awarded for 2,500 Wins
Currently 262 Players would qualify for the Medal on the Day of Introduction

i would qualify twice - Standard and Fog.

[SirSebstar]

is there somewhere i can choose none of the above?