what is the current reccord of most men on one territory?

by **TheOtherOne** on Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:57 pm

Well, does any one know?

by **Bruceswar** on Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:01 pm

Game 1204465 283109 is the most I know of.

by **TheOtherOne** on Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:01 pm

Bruceswar wrote:Game 1204465 283109 is the most I know of.

hum...seems my bud an i have a long way to go

by **owenshooter** on Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:49 pm

TheOtherOne wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Game 1204465 283109 is the most I know of.

hum...seems my bud an i have a long way to go

yeah, good luck.. we have broken the gaming machine in that match and are unable to cash cards now... so, we are doing it 53 armies at a pop, and have been for close to a year...-0

by **TheOtherOne** on Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:57 pm

this is my game

Game 4509102

we started about 3 months ago

by **mibi** on Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:53 pm

owenshooter wrote:
TheOtherOne wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Game 1204465 283109 is the most I know of.

hum...seems my bud an i have a long way to go

yeah, good luck.. we have broken the gaming machine in that match and are unable to cash cards now... so, we are doing it 53 armies at a pop, and have been for close to a year...-0

Wow, that's commitment. No doubt you've had at least a dozen fizzled relationships in that time.

by **owenshooter** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:43 am

TheOtherOne wrote:this is my game

Game 4509102

we started about 3 months ago

you are nowhere near the game bruce listed... good luck...-0

by **mibi** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 am

owenshooter wrote:
TheOtherOne wrote:this is my game

Game 4509102

we started about 3 months ago

you are nowhere near the game bruce listed... good luck...-0

Yes but they are deploying 7 times as many troops per turn.

by **Snorri1234** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:58 am

mibi wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
TheOtherOne wrote:this is my game

Game 4509102

we started about 3 months ago

you are nowhere near the game bruce listed... good luck...-0

Yes but they are deploying 7 times as many troops per turn.

Yeah but eventually they will be unable to.

by **owenshooter** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:15 pm

mibi wrote:Yes but they are deploying 7 times as many troops per turn.

and eventually they won't be able to... our next cash is worth 2,030 troops, and has been for some time. we gave lack both our passwords so he could look at it and work on it. his synopsis was, "deadbeat out of the game." the other game won't catch us, no way...-0

by **karelpietertje** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:18 pm

so wouldnt it be better to have one player take the whole board except for one territory to get more armies per turn?
it would take a lot less time to get a big stack then.

by **owenshooter** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:22 pm

karelpietertje wrote:so wouldnt it be better to have one player take the whole board except for one territory to get more armies per turn?
it would take a lot less time to get a big stack then.

have you even looked at our game? at this point, we are afraid that if we auto our stack it will just break, period. we already can't cash, we already can't enforce or move troops anywhere... what are the odds of those 2 big stacks attacking and getting an outcome other than an error or a server blowing up here in texas?! yeah, me and bruce know where it is, and we have evil plans to take over the site!!! anyway, we are hoping it works itself out, so we can finally attack...-0

by **TheOtherOne** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:22 pm

owenshooter wrote:
mibi wrote:Yes but they are deploying 7 times as many troops per turn.

and eventually they won't be able to... our next cash is worth 2,030 troops, and has been for some time. we gave lack both our passwords so he could look at it and work on it. his synopsis was, "deadbeat out of the game." the other game won't catch us, no way...-0

o we will get up there soon

by **jmelovesGod** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:39 pm

mibi wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
TheOtherOne wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Game 1204465 283109 is the most I know of.

hum...seems my bud an i have a long way to go

yeah, good luck.. we have broken the gaming machine in that match and are unable to cash cards now... so, we are doing it 53 armies at a pop, and have been for close to a year...-0

Wow, that's commitment. No doubt you've had at least a dozen fizzled relationships in that time.

lol actually only one for me, but thats enough. What was the most you got for cards?

by **karelpietertje** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:50 pm

owenshooter wrote:
karelpietertje wrote:so wouldnt it be better to have one player take the whole board except for one territory to get more armies per turn?
it would take a lot less time to get a big stack then.

have you even looked at our game? at this point, we are afraid that if we auto our stack it will just break, period. we already can't cash, we already can't enforce or move troops anywhere... what are the odds of those 2 big stacks attacking and getting an outcome other than an error or a server blowing up here in texas?! yeah, me and bruce know where it is, and we have evil plans to take over the site!!! anyway, we are hoping it works itself out, so we can finally attack...-0

well this thread isn't about your game... i was talking to the guy who started it, who is in the mogul game :lol:

by **JoshyBoy** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:20 pm

283109?

that's brilliant!

by **owenshooter** on Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:33 pm

jmelovesGod wrote: What was the most you got for cards?

we are stuck at a cash of 2,030 right now...

karelpietertje wrote:well this thread isn't about your game... i was talking to the guy who started it, who is in the mogul game

well, he asked for the game with most troops on one territory, and that would be our game... soooo, how is it not about our game or any other game with more troops on one square than is? other than that, i fully get your post now that you stated it was about the mogul game...-0

by **TheOtherOne** on Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:37 am

karelpietertje wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
karelpietertje wrote:so wouldnt it be better to have one player take the whole board except for one territory to get more armies per turn?
it would take a lot less time to get a big stack then.

have you even looked at our game? at this point, we are afraid that if we auto our stack it will just break, period. we already can't cash, we already can't enforce or move troops anywhere... what are the odds of those 2 big stacks attacking and getting an outcome other than an error or a server blowing up here in texas?! yeah, me and bruce know where it is, and we have evil plans to take over the site!!! anyway, we are hoping it works itself out, so we can finally attack...-0

well this thread isn't about your game... i was talking to the guy who started it, who is in the mogul game

we thought about this (and even did it once), but we want to auto attack each other when we want to give up.

by **jbrettlip** on Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:10 pm

Our number can be passed, if you are getting more than 50 troops per turn. You just can't do anyhting with them. If we could cash cards, we could keep growing, but we can't. An Autoattack would break CC, and then we still couldn't advance the troops.