Conquer Club

Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby a.sub on Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:22 pm

I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!
User avatar
Cadet a.sub
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:07 am

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby lord voldemort on Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:25 pm

a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!

my question..if you were playing in real life...why would you roll a 40v1...like id give up after i lost my first 10 troops...
unless it was an obvious win
and that would suck to roll 3 dice 40 times...urgh...what spoils were you playing?
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby AndyDufresne on Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:31 pm

They have Auto-Assault in real life!? ;)


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby lord voldemort on Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:33 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:They have Auto-Assault in real life!? ;)


--Andy

i must get this for my risk board....
and here i was rolling dice like a sucker
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby mibi on Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:44 pm

a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!



I don't believe you. Your chance of success was 99.99999999999997%
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby nikola_milicki on Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:51 pm

a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!


:lol: righttttttttttttttttt
Colonel nikola_milicki
 
Posts: 1015
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:17 pm
Location: CROATIA

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby maasman on Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:53 pm

I've played enough real life risk to know that this is believable
Image
User avatar
Major maasman
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: Goose Creek, USA

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby mibi on Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:02 pm

maasman wrote:I've played enough real life risk to know that this is believable


no you haven't, the odds are too small.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby Georgerx7di on Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:19 pm

mibi wrote:
a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!



I don't believe you. Your chance of success was 99.99999999999997%



20,000 people on this site. Each has probably played many risk games, during which you roll the dice many times. They are also playing with other people, who may not be on this site. So if you figure 4 to 5 players a game, then we're looking at 80,000 to 100,000 people. During the course of one game you roll the dice hundreds of times. So lets suppose that the average player on this site has played 10 games, with 4 other people who are not on this site. And lets suppose that each player rolls 100 times per game. Now we're at 100 million rolls. So i would be reasonable for something to happen where the odds were 1/100,000,000. Now your numbers are 1 in 333 billion. However, I used only 100 rolls per game for 10 games. It's possible that those numbers are highers. Maybe its 500 rolls per game, and 60 games. Now we're at 3 billion rolls between us on the site and people we played with. Throw in a little standard deviation, its not impossible.
User avatar
Major Georgerx7di
 
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby whitestazn88 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:10 am

Georgerx7di wrote:
mibi wrote:
a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!



I don't believe you. Your chance of success was 99.99999999999997%



20,000 people on this site. Each has probably played many risk games, during which you roll the dice many times. They are also playing with other people, who may not be on this site. So if you figure 4 to 5 players a game, then we're looking at 80,000 to 100,000 people. During the course of one game you roll the dice hundreds of times. So lets suppose that the average player on this site has played 10 games, with 4 other people who are not on this site. And lets suppose that each player rolls 100 times per game. Now we're at 100 million rolls. So i would be reasonable for something to happen where the odds were 1/100,000,000. Now your numbers are 1 in 333 billion. However, I used only 100 rolls per game for 10 games. It's possible that those numbers are highers. Maybe its 500 rolls per game, and 60 games. Now we're at 3 billion rolls between us on the site and people we played with. Throw in a little standard deviation, its not impossible.


what?
Lieutenant whitestazn88
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: behind you

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby mibi on Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:15 am

Georgerx7di wrote:
mibi wrote:
a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!



I don't believe you. Your chance of success was 99.99999999999997%



20,000 people on this site. Each has probably played many risk games, during which you roll the dice many times. They are also playing with other people, who may not be on this site. So if you figure 4 to 5 players a game, then we're looking at 80,000 to 100,000 people. During the course of one game you roll the dice hundreds of times. So lets suppose that the average player on this site has played 10 games, with 4 other people who are not on this site. And lets suppose that each player rolls 100 times per game. Now we're at 100 million rolls. So i would be reasonable for something to happen where the odds were 1/100,000,000. Now your numbers are 1 in 333 billion. However, I used only 100 rolls per game for 10 games. It's possible that those numbers are highers. Maybe its 500 rolls per game, and 60 games. Now we're at 3 billion rolls between us on the site and people we played with. Throw in a little standard deviation, its not impossible.


he talking real life, not CC. Roll 300 billion rolls in real life and your arm explodes.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby owenshooter on Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:11 am

Georgerx7di wrote: Now we're at 3 billion rolls between us on the site and people we played with. Throw in a little standard deviation, its not impossible.

but he was talking about real life... 3 billion rolls in real life, is that even possible? i doubt even JR could hit that many rolls in his life...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13276
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby Georgerx7di on Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:17 am

mibi wrote:
Georgerx7di wrote:
mibi wrote:
a.sub wrote:I just lost a 40v1 in real life
f*ck real dice too!



I don't believe you. Your chance of success was 99.99999999999997%



20,000 people on this site. Each has probably played many risk games, during which you roll the dice many times. They are also playing with other people, who may not be on this site. So if you figure 4 to 5 players a game, then we're looking at 80,000 to 100,000 people. During the course of one game you roll the dice hundreds of times. So lets suppose that the average player on this site has played 10 games, with 4 other people who are not on this site. And lets suppose that each player rolls 100 times per game. Now we're at 100 million rolls. So i would be reasonable for something to happen where the odds were 1/100,000,000. Now your numbers are 1 in 333 billion. However, I used only 100 rolls per game for 10 games. It's possible that those numbers are highers. Maybe its 500 rolls per game, and 60 games. Now we're at 3 billion rolls between us on the site and people we played with. Throw in a little standard deviation, its not impossible.


he talking real life, not CC. Roll 300 billion rolls in real life and your arm explodes.


Mibi, your comment indicates that you did not read carefully. I'm saying that 100,000 people could accumulate 3 billion rolls. That's 30,000 rolls. If you play a game of risk, you roll more than 100 times. So if you roll a few hundred rolls a game, then its wouldn't be that hard to accumulate 30,000 rolls. If you get together with friends once a week and roll the dice 200 times a game, then you roll 30,000 times in a year.
User avatar
Major Georgerx7di
 
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby targetman377 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:30 am

:lol: :lol: well i think its possiable i mean look i play risk and i have alot and i have seen alot of bad rolls
VOTE AUTO/TARGET in 12
User avatar
Sergeant targetman377
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby maasman on Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:43 am

You have no idea how much risk I've played and how many ridiculous winning and losing streaks I've seen ;)
Image
User avatar
Major maasman
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: Goose Creek, USA

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby Falkomagno on Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:17 am

I just can believe that.....it can be prove that the dice is not so fucked up here....thing that I seriously doubt. I prefer not to trust you, and still be angry with the dice randomness here
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Falkomagno
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:49 pm
Location: Even in a rock or in a piece of wood. In sunsets often

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby a.sub on Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:07 pm

for curious minds, i was rolling against her last territ
User avatar
Cadet a.sub
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:07 am

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby Lucarilover240 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:44 pm

mibi wrote:
maasman wrote:I've played enough real life risk to know that this is believable


no you haven't, the odds are too small.

SOMEBODY has no idea what reality is really like.
Image [This signature saved as part of ancient history, dating back to 2010]
Image <- img courtesy of Zoebear1
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Lucarilover240
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: The deepest, darkest corners of the internet...

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby sully800 on Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:33 am

Where did we get 1 in 333 billion? Just curious because I tried to check the math and got odds that are much worse

Chance of losing 3vs1 = 0.3403
Chance of losing 2vs1 = 0.4213
Chance of losing 1vs1 = 0.5833

0.3403^37*.4213*.5833 = 1.173*10^-18

Which translates to 1 in 8.52*10^17

Which translates to 1 in 852 quadrillion, or 1 in 852,000 trillion for those who only know trillion. Mistake? This seems unbelievably high...

Edit: Maybe he and 39 of his friends lost a fight against 1 dude....
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby targetman377 on Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:48 am

it could happan i have seen some shit man i have seen some shit
VOTE AUTO/TARGET in 12
User avatar
Sergeant targetman377
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby sully800 on Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:57 am

targetman377 wrote:it could happan i have seen some shit man i have seen some shit


If my math was right, each person in the world would have to roll a die 142 million times before that result is expected to come up.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Re: Why the CC "intensity cubes" are realistic

Postby Georgerx7di on Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 am

sully800 wrote:Where did we get 1 in 333 billion? Just curious because I tried to check the math and got odds that are much worse

Chance of losing 3vs1 = 0.3403
Chance of losing 2vs1 = 0.4213
Chance of losing 1vs1 = 0.5833

0.3403^37*.4213*.5833 = 1.173*10^-18

Which translates to 1 in 8.52*10^17

Which translates to 1 in 852 quadrillion, or 1 in 852,000 trillion for those who only know trillion. Mistake? This seems unbelievably high...

Edit: Maybe he and 39 of his friends lost a fight against 1 dude....


I got that from the other guys number of 99.99...% whatever he posted on the first page. I think you may be right, you numbers look a little bit better. And they make it a lot less likely.



Btw, I don't think their called "intensity cubes", although they can be intense. I think their called assault cubes.
User avatar
Major Georgerx7di
 
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users