King_Herpes wrote:targetman377 wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
can i have mine with leamons???
Unfortunately the mods and I are all out of leamons but they do have plenty of fresh squeezed liaisons if interested.
you know king that would work

Moderator: Community Team
King_Herpes wrote:targetman377 wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
can i have mine with leamons???
Unfortunately the mods and I are all out of leamons but they do have plenty of fresh squeezed liaisons if interested.
timmytuttut88 wrote:Does anyone know why pimpdave has been banned for half a month?
King_Herpes wrote:timmytuttut88 wrote:Does anyone know why pimpdave has been banned for half a month?
I heard he was pimping out Clapper, Insomnia Red, and Jennifer Marie and Cc got all bent out of shape about it. As if he was actually trying to pander money off of this site just because his name happens to be pimpdave. He was merely trying to raise the monies to help his dear mom who has a spinal condition.
Woodruff wrote:TheBro wrote:So.....
Someone who got a forum vacation can come back with another account, get busted, buy premium, live on?
Sure, but they'd still be forum vacationed.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Posted here because the idea is still rough.
Idea:
When someone is perma-banned for FORUM or chat abuse (only -- that is, no cheaters, no "I was a complete jerk to administration", no one making serious threats, etc.), a group of users could petition to have the person reinstated. The matter would be put for a vote in the main forum (currently named Turtle Soup).
PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheBro wrote:So.....
Someone who got a forum vacation can come back with another account, get busted, buy premium, live on?
Sure, but they'd still be forum vacationed.
uh.. no. I am pretty sure that if they have once been banned, they are banned if they are rediscovered.
Night Strike wrote:Actually, the policy does make a whole lot of sense. For multiple accounts, you get ONE warning, and that warning costs you $25.
owenshooter wrote:Night Strike wrote:Actually, the policy does make a whole lot of sense. For multiple accounts, you get ONE warning, and that warning costs you $25.
seriously... are you really going to try and state this as fact when any forum regular can easily name at least 4-5 members that have violated this policy and are still around after multiple purchases? really? are you going to hang your hat on that? because it isn't true. you have max, and that is about it. and truth be told, max is still here!!-0
owenshooter wrote:Night Strike wrote:Actually, the policy does make a whole lot of sense. For multiple accounts, you get ONE warning, and that warning costs you $25.
seriously... are you really going to try and state this as fact when any forum regular can easily name at least 4-5 members that have violated this policy and are still around after multiple purchases? really? are you going to hang your hat on that? because it isn't true. you have max, and that is about it. and truth be told, max is still here!!-0
Woodruff wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheBro wrote:So.....
Someone who got a forum vacation can come back with another account, get busted, buy premium, live on?
Sure, but they'd still be forum vacationed.
uh.. no. I am pretty sure that if they have once been banned, they are banned if they are rediscovered.
How is that not what I said? I used the term "forum vacationed" because that's the term TheBro used, and it seemed more accurate because it Could apply both to short vacations as well as the long ones (including a permanent forum ban), but other than the term I used...
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users