Moderator: Community Team
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:I don't believe for a second that Woodruff took any threats seriously. He loves drama and an opportunity has presented itself and he's going for broke.
I've voiced my concerns over cyber bullying here before. But not "I'm gonna hunt you down and blah blah blah" crap. The harmful stuff is the psychological torment that can be applied to a person.
I've seen Woodruff act passive-aggressive and he has tried to be hurtful many times. This is just the same thing, but in a bigger way. "What?? Me?!?! I was only concerned for my safety!! I wasn't trying to screw anybody over!!" Bullcrap, Woodruff. You are a vindictive person.
Fortunately, I think the authorities are going to tell him he's a nut.
PLAYER57832 wrote:AAFitz
Good post. I won't quote it all. However, 2 points.
First, I agree that if CC did not let the information get out (if they did not take sufficient security), they are not directly responsible. I won't cite any legal precedents (such as Craig's list) because the jurisdiction differs and this is an area where the law is still in flux, being changed almost continually. (the result of new technology, powers, etc.).
When I talk about forum shutdown or leven just serious curtailment, I mean that this is, as we have been told repeatedly, a gaming site. If the forums get to be too much of a bother, any business would just eliminate them. I am not privy to the data, the reasoning, etc. Right now, the forums are serving a purpose.. either just the desire of admin or, more likely, they are helping to keep this an active site. However, that balance could tip. Lawsuits, continual harrassment of mods, complaints that don't end and general bickering are certainly moving that balance closer to the tipping point.
I suspect that as yet, the "tipping point" is pretty far. However, that could change. That was my only real point.
That is also, (a point I know you realize, but maybe others don't) why I do make suggestions about clarifying rules and policies, even the occasional complaint. I do so because I want the site to stay. Not just the site, but the forums.
PLAYER57832 wrote:
First, I agree that if CC did not let the information get out (if they did not take sufficient security), they are not directly responsible.
Lawsuits, continual harrassment of mods, complaints that don't end and general bickering are certainly moving that balance closer to the tipping point...
notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
chaosfactor wrote:notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
In 1904: King Edward VII granted them the prefix 'Royal' and so the force then became known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Before 1904 they were simply known as the Canadian Mounted Police.
I referred to them as Privates, Sergeants and Lieutenants, because I was drawing a comparison based on the ranking system in this game. If I mentioned constables they would have been confused with the moderators on this site.
If you didn't like us Brits maligning them in the first place, why agree to them being called Royal in the first place?
notyou2 wrote:chaosfactor wrote:notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
In 1904: King Edward VII granted them the prefix 'Royal' and so the force then became known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Before 1904 they were simply known as the Canadian Mounted Police.
I referred to them as Privates, Sergeants and Lieutenants, because I was drawing a comparison based on the ranking system in this game. If I mentioned constables they would have been confused with the moderators on this site.
If you didn't like us Brits maligning them in the first place, why agree to them being called Royal in the first place?
Because you foisted it on the peace loving peoples of Canada. Please remove your royal charter forthwith.
notyou2 wrote:I left my toque on the wood stove to dry last week and it melted. I'll have to knit a new one eh.
OK, I get your point, but please return all the resources you have stripped from this great country for 500 years.
notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:
There is no comparison.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
jonesthecurl wrote:Yup, the brit bobbies just can't tap-dance to save their life.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users