I'm starting this in regards to thegreekdog's question.
I'm a newcomer to the forum scene, and I've never frequented this place when Flame Wars was going on, so Flame Wars for me is the stuff of LEGEND.
What I would like to see here is one format for replies:
1) Pros:
2) Cons:
3) Should it be brought back: Yes? No? Why or why not?
And do try and be civil, you crass bastards! Otherwise, the mods will lock this, and even worse for the pro-Flame Wars'ers, nothing will get accomplished to achieving what they want. I want this thread to have clearly stated before all the different arguments behind this decision of banning flame wars and why the ban should or should not be maintained. If this goal is accomplished, then it can end much of the tension about the issue since the many points and arguments that could be brought up are right here and able to be read clearly.
But before you begin, of course, you can reply to someone's pros and cons without that previous format, but do cite some examples or at least be a little coherent and smaat in your reply. A simply, f*ck YOU, YOU'RE AN IDIOT can be funny, but in this thread, it won't be productive. If you feel anyone's being a jerk, then deal with it outside, not here--basically, don't be a child.