lord voldemort wrote:Your ban had nothing to do with that game.I explained clearly what it was for. As for the whole 48 hour. It should of been 72...as the escalating system goes warning, 24, 72 etc..not 48 in the middle. King A corrected the length of the ban and thats that. Ey im new we all make mistakes.
Everything we moderate is checked by andy and king a and optimus so if you don't like the desision made then be my guest and make an appeal...
Now as for the game. DF was upset cause someone just wasnt afraid of his points and I wont be told how to play the game. I was in a position to attack and I did. Read the log...Funny now after he suicided me..Im still winning
LV, I'm going to say this and not to challenge you or anyone else. But, I have yet to receive an "Official" FIRST warning for flaming players. My ban was simply given combining TWO quotes together that I had said against jef (jefjef) and then calculated the first quote as being my first warning/first offence. All I can say, is that there has to be some accountability on the admins/mods part. Personal feelings have to be set aside. Realization of potential conflict of interests MUST be recognized. If not, then of course there will be a voice of concern raised in any action taken, especially if a punishment is handed down. There is some validity to demonfork wondering how he was served the punishment given by a moderator who was in the same game as him. If this isn't considered a conflict of interest, then this would concern me and I'm sure many others as to what I've said before - accountability.