getting banned

by **number five** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:53 pm

can you get banned for having only 1 point?
would anybody ever get banned for having one point?

by **mpjh** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:55 pm

What's your point?

by **nippersean** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:56 pm

I think they'd possibly be accused of point dumping.

by **Bruceswar** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:37 pm

mpjh wrote:What's your point?

Jan 2nd someone with low points could win a battle royal and get really nice nice points. 109 players at 100 each is 10,900 in score from one game.

by **natty dread** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:52 am

This thread inspired me to look at the bottom of the scoreboard...

I saw a few that seem really fishy:

name - score - games played - won (%)

nomani 112 1753 444 (25%)
SlickChrisDruler 457 4306 1800 (42%)
phucewe2 526 675 154 (23%)

See, they all have many games played, and a win percentage over 20, yet their score is suspiciously low...

by **lord voldemort** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:24 am

1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

by **colton24** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:00 am

lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

by **nippersean** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:22 am

Colton

Read this thread

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=98690&p=2249746#p2249746

Nipper

by **mpjh** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:52 am

Bruceswar wrote:
mpjh wrote:What's your point?

Jan 2nd someone with low points could win a battle royal and get really nice nice points. 109 players at 100 each is 10,900 in score from one game.

OHHHHH. I thought he was talking about point of view. Yes, you can get banned, depending on whether you express a point of view that is racists or bigoted. Never played battle royal, so don't know the score there.

by **Little Witt** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:40 am

so that means a point dumper can get about 11k of points and is number 1 thats not rightbut man i wish i could win a battle royal game

by **lord voldemort** on Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:51 am

colton24 wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

well i think so :roll:

by **Gilligan** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:54 am

There have been many at one point, and they were banned for Lowballing.

by **darkangelsguy205** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:02 pm

yes you can its called point dumping

by **the.killing.44** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:06 pm

Gilligan wrote:There have been many at one point, and they were banned for Lowballing.

Low-balling's something different

by **nippersean** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:57 pm

As a LOL - AAFitz gonna have to turn his own father in soon if he's not careful

But the thread clearly shows that the guys were taking the piss..

by **c-rod91339** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:31 pm

isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard :-s

by **colton24** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:59 pm

lord voldemort wrote:
colton24 wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

well i think so

Right so when I was a 210 cook I was automatically point dumping. :roll:

by **Bones2484** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:03 pm

colton24 wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:
colton24 wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

well i think so

Right so when I was a 210 cook I was automatically point dumping.

What are you trying to prove, here? The discussion is about nearing 1 point. Having 265 (which is actually your low, not 210) is not close to 1.

by **the.killing.44** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:03 pm

c-rod91339 wrote:isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard

No. It's when a good player takes some low-ranks and just tells them what to do in a game against multiple high-ranks. For maximum point gain. Like this asshole.

by **lord voldemort** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:
c-rod91339 wrote:isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard

No. It's when a good player takes some low-ranks and just tells them what to do in a game against multiple high-ranks. For maximum point gain. Like this asshole.

nooo low balling is actively trying to get to 1 point...
@ colton....210 points is a far cry from 1 point

by **Gilligan** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:32 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:
Gilligan wrote:There have been many at one point, and they were banned for Lowballing.

Low-balling's something different

Uhh.... lowballing is TRYING to get one point, which is what he asked about in the first post... :?:

by **c-rod91339** on Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:06 pm

lol whoops O:)

getting banned

getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Re: getting banned

Who is online