When does someone deserved to be foed?
- For being rude beyond the scope of expected trash talk? - Maybe.
- For playing very badly? - I would.
- For deliberately ruining your game and/or cheating? - Certainly!
- For beating you with superior dice in a 1v1 game? - ............WHAT?!
Here is why I ask: $25 a year is cheap. No wonder.
Lets leave aside the fact that lt.Futt is an SoC Training Advisor, because I want to focus on the reason given for adding Hannibal 19 to his foe list. The reason being, as best as I can understand, because Hannibal 19 is receiving some good dice..... Yes I know, incredible isn't it?
Lets put this into perspective with a little bit of well known CC history, there used to be a player called KLOBBER, whom was infamous for a number of reasons, most of all for his humongous foe list. If you beat KLOBBER, you got added to his foe list, if you made it to Lieutenant or better in rank, you got added to his foe list. Basically if you showed any signs of proficiency at this game, KLOBBER added you to his foe list. It got to the point that virtually everyone who posted on the forums was on KLOBBER's foe list. I can't begin to imagine the amount of clicking he had to do in one day just to read the individual posts of each thread that interested him. Anyway, the point is that KLOBBER was clearly using the foe list for something other than it was intended.
So I ask you all, when is it acceptable to foe someone? What criteria do you use when considering new additions to your foe list?
Discuss!