Moderator: Community Team
joecoolfrog wrote:Partly its the loss of classic, many people enjoy playing risk and you cannot any more, partly its the amount of cheats, multis and farmers who have discredited the achievement of getting a high rank.
Stephen Wayne wrote:my answer is not an option
i think it is a combo of high ranks and mods
the mods rule like children making rules that seem to be helpful and friendly but do not go into the deeper reasoning of man and think the long term unintentional effects
then we ever new blood comes in they are murderd
i cant belive the site still runs
guess we are a bunch of addics
Iron Butterfly wrote:OMFG you mean there are less then 20,000 people for me to play?? Ill be really shaken when there are a little less then 19,000..the horror..the horror.
timmytuttut88 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:OMFG you mean there are less then 20,000 people for me to play?? Ill be really shaken when there are a little less then 19,000..the horror..the horror.
Wow we've got ourselves a character here? You don't think that some sort of statement is being made when the sites membership goes from 25000 to 19750? So you must have also thought nothing happened when Dow Jones plunged from 10000+ down to 8000. Keep in mind that the conquerclub user plunge is something farely recent. It's not like this has been happening slowly over time, this is a plunge.
DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID wrote:Classic was most peoples favourite maps. People didnt come on here to play gay gimmick maps, they all started on classic
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
e_i_pi wrote: Here's some you neglected:
- Seasonal trends
e_i_pi wrote:Market saturation
e_i_pi wrote:Lack of advertising
e_i_pi wrote:Organisational problems with the maps and game settings
e_i_pi wrote:Organisational problems with the forums
e_i_pi wrote:Hostile nature of ... how do I say this diplomatically ... 'young' users who are intent upon croning on about how wonderful they are and how crap everyone else is
e_i_pi wrote:The amount of shouting down that occurs in the Foundry and Tournament forums to new users who wish to contribute but don't know how
e_i_pi wrote:The class division that exists between 'popular' ranked players and stripes, making the environment seem hostile to newcomers
e_i_pi wrote:The dictatorial nature of some players, telling people what to do every move, and spitting chips when they don't do exaclty what is told (I experienced this first-hand in one of my first 10 games... from some douche who now languishes at the 1500 mark, and strangely enough languished there when I first came to the site - there is no accounting for aggro retards)
e_i_pi wrote:The numbers of posts started by a select few carrying on about how terrible the site is, while they continue to play game after game, renewing their membership year after year, then finally going out in a 'blaze of glory', which is really just a forum ban then a bunch of busted multi's
e_i_pi wrote:An increase in busted multi's and site security. q.v. wicked, Interfacer PH, norse, et al
Night Strike wrote:Busted multis are removed from the scoreboard, so all those multis by *manimal, IPH, suggs, albertq, etc. increase the number for a bit but return it after they get busted. Also, you have to have completed a game to be on the scoreboard anyway.
I think the biggest issues are farming and long time between turns. I probably wouldn't have wanted to come back if my first few games were against super high ranks who just demolished me. Also, a lot of people probably get impatient with having to wait a while between turns.
I do agree with e_i_pi's point about the users who keep yelling about how bad the site is yet continue playing here. The forums are posted in by far fewer than the number of active users, but there probably is a somewhat higher percentage who read the forums yet never comment. So they're seeing all the crap in the forums and wonder why those people stick around.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
RiskTycoon wrote:when you say 20%-25% is that as a whole or are we talking just paying members ? I'd be curious to see the decline in the different categories ... Freemium, Premium and then as a whole ....
wonder what the numbers look like broken down like that ?
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
barterer2002 wrote:So here is a question. You're contending that the scoreboard used to list 2500 players and now lists 19750? How does someone get off the scoreboard except by a ban/bust? Even players that aren't active are still listed on the scoreboard. Is it possible that they just cleaned up a bunch of players who were busted over the past 6 years or so or that you're 2500 number is incorrect (or both).
Maybe I'm not understanding how the scoreboard works and someone can correct me but at the moment, I'm rejecting your general premise.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users