Moderator: Community Team
Yes passispaws is a friend? So? I do "deliberately" help him gain points, so what?
alstergren wrote:GrazingCattle wrote:This, as they have pointed out, is the Community Suggested Ignore list. [not CC Sanctioned]
You have had no one in the community defend your actions. Most feel that what you are doing is in poor taste. If you would like to seek measures to get your name removed from the SIL you can petition for the committee to hear your case. I will contact them if you like, but I am 99% certain that they will stand by the decision to add you.
Sigh. Must say that I hoped that this silly idea would die out and ya’ll would go back to your regular business.
Again, I would like to point out the obvious: This is your personal suggested ignore list (or rather you and your “Committee’s” suggested ignore list). This is in no way a reflection about the general CC Community’s feelings. So far, I’ve only seen a dozen or so people posting in here. And those favoring this kind of bs-list are the same people who usually sit on a high horse as soon as tactics and strategies are discussed.
In the post above, you are allowed to go on a witch-hunt against this simtom guy. In my opinion, this should be done in the flame wars section, not under some kind of moral fake authority like this.
I had hoped that you would address the obvious sooner or later, like for example this post by ZawBanjito:ZawBanjito wrote:I'm stating that it strikes me as counterproductive (shall we say) that you've started a big witchhunt forum for people who feel a need to complain more than they are otherwise politely allowed to, swaggering around like a sheriff doing "research" and passing judgement like a moderator, and then coming across hurt and defensive when people point out that there's no need to be doing what you're doing, like "I was just trying to help and I guess that some people want games to be ruined." Clearly, the vast majority wants either of those things.
So I'll ask a question: Why? Why are you doing this? Name one need that is being filled by this list you're putting together. One thing that is not already filled by a function of the site, or an appointed moderator, or the good common sense of any player here.
But I guess you’re not up to speaking about that pink elephant in the room, are you you little wanker? At least you is a little bit amusing, reading your posts in here makes me smile about the vanity of Man...
Nameless One wrote:.....u don't have to use this list at all, u could completely ignore it.....
If your score is lower then he gets more points when your team wins. If you artificially lower your score so that he gets more points, then you are cheating.
simtom wrote:If your score is lower then he gets more points when your team wins. If you artificially lower your score so that he gets more points, then you are cheating.
Its not cheating unless it's aganist the rules.
Practically all the highest ranked players use that tactic.
Robinette wrote:Nameless One wrote:.....u don't have to use this list at all, u could completely ignore it.....
Great advice....
I choose to ignore the Community Suggested Ignore List [not CC-sanctioned] for non-Hasbro Risk,
and I choose instead to just play the game.
lackattack wrote:Hi GrazingCattle,
I agree that deadbeats are a huge problem that must be dealt with and I applaud your efforts to fight it! I would like to abolish the missed turns multiplier to avoid strategic deadbeating but I'm waiting until I have time to implement a vacation setting. Also, newbie deadbeats can't be avoided by ignoring them because they don't ever come back. The solution for that is a proper training system. I'd rather focus on those two initiatives when I get back from vacation.
Cheers and thanks for the feedback!
--lackattack
GrazingCattle wrote:If you think that someone is a hindering the site and it's progress feel free to post the accused's (emphasis added) name.
cleveridea wrote:GrazingCattle wrote:If you think that someone is a hindering the site and it's progress feel free to post the accused's (emphasis added) name.
I accuse GrazingCattle for his McCarthy-esque syntax and tactics as someone completely without joy and legitimately worthwhile to be put on your ignore list.
His little post of feedback from lack notwithstanding because this ignore list isn't about deadbeats solely. It's about witch hunting for any cause that any accuser wishes to make an issue as hindering the site.
For instance, I think this joyless b.s. effort hinders the site. And, that is why I nominate GrazingCattle and any others in the braintrust of this corrupted and petty effort.
Nameless One wrote:No one is making anybody do anything, u don't have to use this list at all, u could completely ignore it. In the end, it is up to the person to put these people on their ignore list, no one is forcing them.
Nameless One wrote:No one is making anybody do anything, u don't have to use this list at all, u could completely ignore it. In the end, it is up to the person to put these people on their ignore list, no one is forcing them.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
cleveridea wrote:GrazingCattle wrote:If you think that someone is a hindering the site and it's progress feel free to post the accused's (emphasis added) name.
I accuse GrazingCattle for his McCarthy-esque syntax and tactics as someone completely without joy and legitimately worthwhile to be put on your ignore list.
His little post of feedback from lack notwithstanding because this ignore list isn't about deadbeats solely. It's about witch hunting for any cause that any accuser wishes to make an issue as hindering the site.
For instance, I think this joyless b.s. effort hinders the site. And, that is why I nominate GrazingCattle and any others in the braintrust of this corrupted and petty effort.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
alstergren wrote:cleveridea wrote:GrazingCattle wrote:If you think that someone is a hindering the site and it's progress feel free to post the accused's (emphasis added) name.
I accuse GrazingCattle for his McCarthy-esque syntax and tactics as someone completely without joy and legitimately worthwhile to be put on your ignore list.
His little post of feedback from lack notwithstanding because this ignore list isn't about deadbeats solely. It's about witch hunting for any cause that any accuser wishes to make an issue as hindering the site.
For instance, I think this joyless b.s. effort hinders the site. And, that is why I nominate GrazingCattle and any others in the braintrust of this corrupted and petty effort.
Good luck. This is the second this name was posted. However, I’ve seen no “Committee” discussions/votes on the matter.
However, I guess that would be like if the Politburo would have voted Stalin of the ballot lists…
Also..this is people you would want to add to your ignore list...Posts on the forums are unlikely to count, so your accusation of Grazing is absolutly argumentless.
freezie wrote:I discussed the matter already.
freezie wrote:Also..this is people you would want to add to your ignore list...Posts on the forums are unlikely to count, so your accusation of Grazing is absolutly argumentless.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
Georgerx7di wrote:fmystic 10-11
fmystic: most complaints against him were for deadbeating rt's. That 11 is not including the one I left him, then deleted later. he joined my rt, then within a few minutes said he had to go in ten minutes. He's left 4 fb's 3 negative.
Guilty_Biscuit wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:fmystic 10-11
fmystic: most complaints against him were for deadbeating rt's. That 11 is not including the one I left him, then deleted later. he joined my rt, then within a few minutes said he had to go in ten minutes. He's left 4 fb's 3 negative.
I looked at fmystic out of his feedbacks 3 were unwarranted and in my opinion should be removed:
game 259483 (he received 2 negs!)
game 291022 (1 neg)
One neg was debatable:
game 288138 (40 min delay - real life happens at some point over 90+ games)
Looking through fmystic's games though you can see that he delays in about one third of his rt games - usually causing the game to slip out of RT. What does the community think? Is ruining one third of your RT games worthy of being on the list? Should he be in a seperate section for RT ignore lists only?
Georgerx7di wrote:when the list finally starts, there should be a breif note next to each player explaining why they are on it. It will help those looking at the list to do their own research because they'll know what to look for. It will also help them to decide if they think it's worth ignoring.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Tyler98