Dukasaur wrote:The Voice wrote:Butters1919 wrote:Gilligan wrote:Where is the "meh" option?
I don't feel that it FAILED, per se. Nor did it achieve great accomplishments. It was somewhere inbetween.
Scroll back in the thread. I made that same argument and had it argued out of me.
I was going to respond to Duk's example, but didn't have time.
On the other hand, the question of "Did Montgomery capture Benghazi?" can be answered in about 20 seconds of looking it up and with no debate whatsoever. It's a simple yes or no, and not a matter of opinion. Either he captured it or he didn't.
Here's the problem with that. If this question isn't a matter of opinion and therefore not up for debate, then why establish a poll in the first place? If the question elicits a purely objective answer, then just tell us whether he failed or succeeded.
Well, I suppose the
selection of criteria might not be objectively, but once they've been selected then they can be
evaluated objectively. So, I suppose the question should really be asking, "based on what you consider important, did the Revolution do accomplish anything useful?"
Glad I didn't write the question...
well question also could be build like:
"based on what you consider important, what implementations bring to us this Revolution
A--minor cosmetic implementations
B--major ,with positive impact implementations
-------------------------------------------------------
me personaly will vote for A, because i dont find any implementation who make big possitive changes, or maybe i dont notice that?