Moderator: Community Team
Robinette wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks?![]()
10 more in one day![]()
stop being so nice to people
go back to your old ways
316
I was always a nice guy
nice (nīs)
adj. nicĀ·er, nicĀ·est
1. Pleasing and agreeable in nature: had a nice time.
2. Having a pleasant or attractive appearance: a nice dress; a nice face.
3. Exhibiting courtesy and politeness: a nice gesture.
4. Of good character and reputation; respectable.
5. Overdelicate or fastidious; fussy.
6. Showing or requiring great precision or sensitive discernment; subtle: a nice distinction; a nice sense of style.
7. Done with delicacy and skill: a nice bit of craft.
8. Used as an intensive with and: nice and warm.
misĀ·unĀ·derĀ·stood /ˌmɪsʌndərˈstʊd/ Pronunciation[mis-uhn-der-stood]
āadjective
1. improperly understood or interpreted.
2. unappreciated.
āverb (used with object), -stood, -standĀ·ing.
1. to take (words, statements, etc.) in a wrong sense; understand wrongly.
2. to fail to understand or interpret rightly the words or behavior of.
Scott-Land wrote:Poo-Maker should be on Top 5 to reach 3.5K ( not sure how many times or how it qualifies) and also Top 5 ranks-singles ( either #2 or #3)
Scott-Land wrote:Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard.
there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........
Blitzaholic wrote:scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x
top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.
Scott-Land wrote:Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard. EDIT: Pretty sure Poo held #2 rank and positive he held #3. Unless all those categories are all under 40- then you are correct.
there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........
poo-maker wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x
top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.
You're right, i only made it over 3500 once.
I got to 2nd place though, with SkyT above me in 1st and comic boy in 3rd.
happy2seeyou wrote:nope, we were having fun teasing each other last night will tell you about it later.
In that game, we each have over 70,000 armies
Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks?![]()
10 more in one day![]()
firstholliday wrote:actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)
1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.
He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.
Just a tosser in my humble opinion.
Gilligan wrote:What about the longest/shortest tournaments, and the tournaments with the most/least games?
firstholliday wrote:actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)
1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.
He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.
Just a tosser in my humble opinion.
David_Wain wrote:And I made ur ignore list because??
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users