hendy wrote:WOW another sped what is up cc?
Add another 'Hendy translator' program for my account.

Moderator: Community Team
hendy wrote:WOW another sped what is up cc?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
AndrewB wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:AndrewB wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:I remember back when there was a coalition of people to suicide on alstergren so he wouldn't reach 3000, did anyone get band then?
no. why is this any different?
Not saying it isnt wrong, just curious at the hypocrisy and double standard?
Kyle, did anyone bribe the players back them?
...
the thing is, is this was a triples partner dugg was trying to get to go against...I know I can trust my teammates to never go against me and they can trust the same in me. Blitz will grab any person off the site just to get points. Thats what dugcarr1 was going against. Its really a trust issue and the fact that killroy considered it shows he isn't loyal to his friends.
So, it's different if everyone wants to gang up on the number one player as long as money is not talked about.?
First of all, I personally would never gang up on any person, just because he has more points.
On the other hand, one thing is when you know upfront, before you start you game that you will be squeezed by every player. And you have an option NOT to join this game.
Completely another story when you start playing and your partner is bribed to throw away his games (or someone else would do it instead of him).
Don't you see the difference, Kyle? At least to say, it is very sneaky. And if you would have been in this situation, you will be posting in forums, and complaining, like there is no tomorrow.
Third, I don't hear altergren complaining here, if anything he is completely behind Blitzaholic.
Nikolai wrote:So, qeee1, since we've established a long time ago that moral relativism = anarchy, why don't you join Rogue State?
Sorry, couldn't resist. Anyway...
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
UCAbears wrote:is he banned right now or not?
Sammy gags wrote:People add him to their ignore list because they are afraid of being beat by him...& a win/loss ratio combined with a point point system cannot be manipulated
Bad Speler wrote:Ive been following this thread for a while, listening to both sides of the argument. I do think that what dugcarr did is MORALLY WRONG, but it is not directly against the rules. I am undecided what should happen to dug, but i do think further regulations should be put in place to prevent this from ever happening again.Sammy gags wrote:People add him to their ignore list because they are afraid of being beat by him...& a win/loss ratio combined with a point point system cannot be manipulated
I add him because of what he did; it is morally wrong
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users