Dako wrote:Reminds me the story of alot.
Too funny, good short read.

Moderator: Community Team
Robinette wrote:AAFitz wrote:Findolphin wrote:In the UK a toilet is aka a loo. The plural is loos. So one could let loose in the loo. Or maybe lose some loose in the loos.
Certainly loulou could lose some loose in the loos...or on lou
Did you both really just say all that?
I think that makes you each a lou sir.
oVo wrote:Isn't it... UR sowrite?
The your/you're/you are & were/we're/we are & there/their/they're/they are
is much worse than lose, loose and yoose.
Speeling is very problematic.
betiko wrote:oVo wrote:Isn't it... UR sowrite?
The your/you're/you are & were/we're/we are & there/their/they're/they are
is much worse than lose, loose and yoose.
Speeling is very problematic.
i agree, these kind of grammar errors are way worse to me too. they just means you don't understand what you're writting! also you forgot were/we're/where
and actually Ted, I think I've always made the mistake so hopefully now I ll remember it!
AAFitz wrote:Robinette wrote:AAFitz wrote:Findolphin wrote:In the UK a toilet is aka a loo. The plural is loos. So one could let loose in the loo. Or maybe lose some loose in the loos.
Certainly loulou could lose some loose in the loos...or on lou
Did you both really just say all that?
I think that makes you each a lou sir.
All that? Thats one of the smallest posts Ive ever made.
Robinette wrote:Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
Depends on what metric you use...
The coolest is squishyg
tec805 wrote:Your brain is loose in your skull, which is why it rattles when you shake your head. You lose your mind when you roll poorly and lose your battle.
I can understand so many people spelling "your" when they meant "you're" or "were" instead of "we're" because I'm not a total grammer/spelling nazi, but come on folks, post after post I read "loose" (in some cases 3 or 4 times in one post!) and I think Webster is going to change the definition just to accommodate all the misspellers on this site!
As long as I'm bitching, did I mention my dice suck?
Pirlo wrote:I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.
squishyg wrote:http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling
Timminz wrote:You're mother kneads two looser lose ways, as apposed too bean lose alot.
DiM wrote:Pirlo wrote:I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.
you forgot your/you're
Dukasaur wrote:DiM wrote:Pirlo wrote:I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.
you forgot your/you're
to, too, and two, of course.
But what really drives me to the point of psychosis, is the its/it's thing. I can understand some of the others as laziness, but using "it's" in places where "its" belongs is actually anti-laziness: the use of an extra keystroke where it's not required. So if it's not laziness, it has to be stupidity.
tec805 wrote:Your brain is loose in your skull, which is why it rattles when you shake your head. You lose your mind when you roll poorly and lose your battle.
I can understand so many people spelling "your" when they meant "you're" or "were" instead of "we're" because I'm not a total grammer/spelling nazi, but come on folks, post after post I read "loose" (in some cases 3 or 4 times in one post!) and I think Webster is going to change the definition just to accommodate all the misspellers on this site!
As long as I'm bitching, did I mention my dice suck?
Robinette wrote:Timminz wrote:You're mother kneads two looser lose ways, as apposed too bean lose alot.
hahahaa.... excellent!!!
so just how much time did you spend on that?
zimmah wrote:tec805 wrote:Your brain is loose in your skull, which is why it rattles when you shake your head. You lose your mind when you roll poorly and lose your battle.
I can understand so many people spelling "your" when they meant "you're" or "were" instead of "we're" because I'm not a total grammer/spelling nazi, but come on folks, post after post I read "loose" (in some cases 3 or 4 times in one post!) and I think Webster is going to change the definition just to accommodate all the misspellers on this site!
As long as I'm bitching, did I mention my dice suck?
i'm quite sure the next dictionary will indeed change the definition of loose. because it's really common, and i also can't understand why everyone keeps typing loose instead of lose. I have seen this for years, and it keeps getting worse. I mean, how hard is it, i think the difference between you're and your and we're and where and were etc. can be a little hard for non-native english speakers. but come on, how hard is it to understand the difference between loose and lose.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Gillipig wrote:I lost to a loose player. He even had a screw loose.
pimpdave wrote:
nippersean wrote:
I'm not a grammer nasti either, nor a spammar passti. I think loose is just a NA thing due to educational deffinshies
KraphtOne wrote:nippersean wrote:
I'm not a grammer nasti either, nor a spammar passti. I think loose is just a NA thing due to educational deffinshies
As an American I can attest to the horrible grammar... Some of my favorite CC game arguments go something like this...
Other idiot: whatever man your playing like a cook...
Kraphtone: It's "you're", you god damned moron...
at which point i usually begin to type out a speech explaining the irony of someone questioning my intelligence whilst failing to grasp basic grammatical fundamentals that my 6 year old niece understands... but then i remember Twain's advice about arguing with fools and I erase the chat and go take my anger out on loved ones...
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users