Wisse wrote:lol qeee is a little boy?
It's true.

Moderator: Community Team
maniacmath17 wrote:Trying to recalculate scores without teams can be misleading.
Robinette wrote:Scores have been adjusted to reflect NO team games what-so-ever...
This is the current score without team games as of March 31st, 2007.
Of course, every win and every loss will slightly effect the score of all remaining games, so this is not 100% accurate. This simply removes the team scores as they were earned. But this should be extremely close, and as good as it can get without lack spliting the scoreboard.
Robinette wrote:So how 'bout it?
Am I missing anybody?
I say the top 10-12 singles players play a series of games together...
All std singles games, of course.
This would be Super Fun... we could even call it the Super Fun tournament!
Anyway, before I get these games started.... are we missing anybody?
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
autoload wrote:qeee1 wrote:I'm out, quitting CC for a while.
He ain't lying. Told me this about a month ago...
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
hendy wrote:Robinette wrote:I now present to you...
Top 10 Highest Scores (without team games)
....................... current score .............. current ........... highest ......
.......................... with NO...................... score............... score ........
........................ team games..............(as of 3/31/07)...........ever.........
1. Hendy. . . . . . 2669 . . . . . . . . . . . 2785 . . . . . . . . 3021
2. Nuke . . . . . . . . . 2598 . . . . . . . . . . . 2528 . . . . . . . . 3160
3. Cyberdaniel. . . . 2533 . . . . . . . . . . . 2654 . . . . . . . . 3145
4. qeee1. . . . . . . . . 2479. . . . . . . . . . . 2506. . . . . . . . . 2506?
5. maniacmath. . . . 2316. . . . . . . . . . . 2647. . . . . . . . . 3185
6. RL_Orange . . . . 2210. . . . . . . . . . . 2094. . . . . . . . . 3088
7.
8.
9.
10.
What is not displayed, is what the highest score each person above has achieved without team games....
The approximate high scores without actually doing the math,
would give us a list that would look like this:
1. Nuke ................. about 3200
2. Hendy ....... about 3150
3. cyberdaniel....... about 3100
4. Robinette ......... about 2950
5. maniacmath...... about 2900
6.
7.
8.
9.
? qeee1 ............... about 2500 (you really shouldn't be on this list yet, little boy)
Scores have been adjusted to reflect NO team games what-so-ever...
This is the current score without team games as of March 31st, 2007.
Of course, every win and every loss will slightly effect the score of the next game, so this is not 100% accurate. This simply removes the team scores as they were earned. But this should be extremely close, and as good as it can get without lack spliting the scoreboard.
(This original thread was tiltled "Top Singles Players" and was moved by an over-zealous mod to the Social Lounge... hee hee, see, you CAN judge a book by it's cover)
Sweet, I'm #1!
juventino wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:still waiting for my score
You have to do your own dirty work...
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:juventino wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:still waiting for my score
You have to do your own dirty work...
its not dirty work. its called making sure the chart is accurate.
sully800 wrote:Are you missing anybody? Robinette, I'm hurt!
I've player 3 team games ever for a net loss of 33 points.
I believe that would make my current score without team games 2349. My highest score ever is in my signature..
Robinette wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:juventino wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:still waiting for my score
You have to do your own dirty work...
its not dirty work. its called making sure the chart is accurate.
Due to the enormity of the task of verifying johnnyrockets games, we have decided to contract this out to an outside accounting firm... all the local companies said it was too much for them, but there are 4 large firms preparing estimates for us now...
The 4 firms are:
* Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
* Ernst & Young
* KPMG
* PricewaterhouseCoopers
Arthur Andersen had the answer within 3 minutes of contacting them, but we question the accuracy after they confirmed that they utilized thier Enron accounting team.
vic wrote:That is why I setup my stats to only reflect wins/loss ratio, because trying to keep a track of skill levels is inherently flawed...
Blitzaholic wrote:please take me off that singles list Robin, I am not in the top 10, over the last 4 days off and on, about 24 in half, well, almost 25 hours it took me to calculate my singles rank, and I was only able to account for just about only a 2000 rank, slightly below, 1982.
Now, for JR, or Johnnyrocket24? wow, I mean, sorry bro, but to count or add and subtract your points could take a solid 2 weeks, perhaps a month to calculate, screw that, lol
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:how about a honorable mention? I dint even make your leet list and my score hasnt been under 2,000 points for like the past 8 months. Sad
_________________
Highest Score- 3252
Highest Place- 3rd
completed games- 2,358 CC Record
triples victories- 589 CC Record
doubles victories- 504 CC Record*
singles victories- 403 CC Record*
*waiting for players to count and say they have more
tahitiwahini wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:how about a honorable mention? I dint even make your leet list and my score hasnt been under 2,000 points for like the past 8 months. Sad
_________________
Highest Score- 3252
Highest Place- 3rd
completed games- 2,358 CC Record
triples victories- 589 CC Record
doubles victories- 504 CC Record*
singles victories- 403 CC Record*
*waiting for players to count and say they have more
Aren't you being too modest. Owing to the tremendous number of games you've played aren't you also entitled to some other CC records?
most losses - CC Record*
most triples losses - CC Record*
most doubles losses - CC Record*
most singles losses - CC Record*
*sort of waiting for players to count and say they have more, but not holding my breath
Just askin'...![]()
Robinette wrote:maniacmath17 wrote:Trying to recalculate scores without teams can be misleading.Robinette wrote:Scores have been adjusted to reflect NO team games what-so-ever...
This is the current score without team games as of March 31st, 2007.
Of course, every win and every loss will slightly effect the score of all remaining games, so this is not 100% accurate. This simply removes the team scores as they were earned. But this should be extremely close, and as good as it can get without lack spliting the scoreboard.
Just in case you missed this MM
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Scarlet Lady