Moderator: Community Team
now you answered your own questionPrankcall wrote:I cleared 3.5k again..This makes 12x now
Prankcall wrote:I've now reached it 13x..Thx that's 13x for 3.5k
Prankcall wrote:Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
poo-maker wrote:Prankcall wrote:Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
Not really what i'm getting at prank. I mean, this particular list just gives a rough estimate as to how many games people have spent around the 3450-3550 mark.
AAFitz wrote:I have the beginning of the ideas for a category here....
Top 5 most all around players...
Based on all of the options offered by CC, and who plays the most variety... possibly based on a percentage of their own games, or weighted by number somehow
It would take some work, My guess is JR would top the list, but there are a few that even he doesnt play, including the entire speed category so that could affect the outcome... I play a good variety too, but again there are maps, and types I hardly play... including assasin....
It may be too complex for this thread, but it would be interesting to see the players who really change it up quite a bit... it would have to include players over 500 games I would think though, or the percentages would be too easy to skew...
anyone interested in this???
poo-maker wrote:Prankcall wrote:Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
Not really what i'm getting at prank. I mean, this particular list just gives a rough estimate as to how many games people have spent around the 3450-3550 mark.
AAFitz wrote:lol... i wasnt saying that playing all the different types made some one better...only that they played them...
i just thought it would be interesting to see who played all the different types... winning wasnt important, and certainly skill didnt mean much...
just another useless stat really, relax guys
it says most all around... not best all around...
This obviously got misunderstood. The idea was to take the percentage of who plays the most variety... skill doesnt even factor into it, if wins arent counted
i used JR as an example because hes played 7000 games, and everyone knows who he is... im not suggesting hes the better or worse than anyone
the idea is to see a list of people who have played the widest range of games... all around... I thought it was clear... wins could be factored in, but wouldnt be 100% necessary unless we wanted them...
it would be nearly as relevant as posts or feedback, but might be interesting to see who played them most variety... i actually am guessing its 5 random players who just happen to play everything...
Did anyone understand what I was going for here....![]()
![]()
JR, i only used you as an example because youve played 7000 games.... I actually doubt youd be in the top 5 of this list... i bet it would be someone random, who plays a bunch of every single type
The idea was to post some criteria, and find out... i think it would be interesting to see who played almost everything... Im not sure anyone knows who that is right now, which is why I came up with the idea.
poo-maker wrote:Prankcall wrote:I've now reached it 13x..Thx that's 13x for 3.5k
I saw a couple pages back that you deleted some of the more biased and unnecessary top 5's and 1st 5's- Blitz. This should have been one of them...
Hotdoggie wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1826059
2008-02-15 23:51:32 - morfam1 gains 389 points
Blitzaholic wrote:
how many was it jr, who was in the game with you, i looked but screen was white
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users