Lindax wrote:xiangwang wrote:Lindax wrote:xiangwang wrote:It doesn't matter, it's not like we can't win games by playing by ourselves (which many of you seem to doubt), just more challenging with higher rankers.
Exactly. That's what we, as honest players, deal with every day!
You're so full of shit it's not even funny anymore. What a fucking loser you are mate(s).
Lx
I don't get it, I play games without kiron and win. It's not like blocking Kiron and I playing suddenly mean our win rate % will drop significantly or at all (it actually increases for me, one less good player to contend against)
Ok. Are you man enough to join a 7 player escalating game on Classic? Sequential of course, non of that 24 hour freestyle bullshit. Then I'll know if you're actually a good player or just a player who knows how to use freestyle and a a certain map to his advantage. And if you do, how do I know it's you taking your turns?
Lx
Why should i choose a setting where I have absolutely no control over? I can't tell the number of games lost on escalation because some idiot attempted to go for the win, failed, the next player just cleaned up. How is that more skilled? No diplomacy, bonuses are insignificant, very few variables to play. Why would I play a game where luck is such an important factor? Look at the top 50 ranks, how many player just plays quads, trips, or doubles against uncoordinated beginners? Tell them to play freestyle 8 players. At least on my games, there are some high rankers who know the map that have to deal with the random plays by beginners and know to recover from stupid hits. That happens to u escalation, game over. Explain how escalation takes more skill when there is no room to maneuvre from setbacks? Over time it is a negative point expactation on the classic map against 7 other random players each time. Sure you may win 1-2 games, but u usually lose 2-3 games. I'm not in a position to lose points for no reason and i'm sure many other players in the top 50 would feel the same too.