If this map is to be one that feeds this hysteria, I will not contribute my time to it. However if you really want to make a map that speaks to a more realistic future, I will be happy to do so.jefjef wrote:porkenbeans wrote:I say nothing! So in answer to your question is it your own wishful thinking? No, I am as patriotic as the next American. I do not want to see this country become fragmented. I do however want to see the government take more responsibility.isaiah40 wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Not at all. Proper names are at the root of this controversy. The other items that need to be debated are not just limited to the names. For example, why do you feel the need to split up the Dems into smaller and separate groups ?
And yes, demographic groups DO change. That is my point. Population growths can be determined with much accuracy. And along with it so can party affiliations of these groups.
The future does not look anything like your map if you consider these projections. so, the real question is, Do you want to make a map that projects the future with some kind of accuracy, or just your own wishful thinking ?
It is my contention that the backlash that we are seeing today is a direct result of people looking at these projections, ...and NOT liking what they see.
This map is like a science fiction movie, book or what have you. It could happen, but the probability of it happening, No! I have taken things I hear out here on the road and have incorporated them into this map. SO these ideas are rally not my own they are a cross section of how the American people are feeling right now. Let's take the Aztalan Empire for instance. There is a group named La Raza (by the way our new US Supreme court justice Sotomayer is a CURRENT standing member of this group) wants to reclaim the lands they lost in the Spanish-American war. I just used that as a possibility of them taking over what I drew in. (they actually would like to take over a much larger portion if the US). I didn't hear any complaints about Texas taking over from Missouri on over to Arizona. One person said I was being racist about The Outfit and the Italian flag. In this case I just used a known group which is called The Outfit (you know Al Capone?) and put them in control around Lake Michigan. Again is that possible, yes, but will it happen, NO! It is all based on a far reaching possibility, so what is wrong with having a non-real map on CC? I see a couple of maps that are based on books, 1 space map and only 2 futuristic maps - US Apocalypse and Global Warming. What is wrong with having another futuristic map based on political/religious factions (and I'm talking about the radical factions not the middle of the road factions) grabbing control of the country?
I say nothing! So in answer to your question is it your own wishful thinking? No, I am as patriotic as the next American. I do not want to see this country become fragmented. I do however want to see the government take more responsibility.
So again this is a probability map not a map based on demographics in the future. Hope this helps make it clearer.
I think that you are being a bit disingenuous here. The fact is, there is a growing fear in our country of the projections that I referred to before. That coupled with the loss of the White House to a non-white, is like a big wake up moment to these projections. And weather you are conscious to it or not, your map has expressed the angst of many whites today, that we are loosing our country and need to band together to take it back.
Hey porkbean,
If all the names were all sanitized like those of the Apocalypse map would you have a problem with Isaiah or allowing the map to proceed or are there other agendas at work here?