jefjef wrote:
Gee. Thanks so much for your "help" and clarification.
Please share your definition of "repeatedly" in re of the owenshooter/jbrett C&A thread with me again.
yes, change the subject to something completely different?
id rather keep it on-topic, but for you jefjef, ill risk the warning...
in the past the precedence was that posting for banned users gets you banned as well. and i know you guys love consistency. except for when it applies to you..
by your interpretation of the rules you would believe that posting once for a banned user is ok, as long as its not twice? this doesnt make any sense to me, why once? if you had posted twice for him would you believe that posting twice is ok as long as its not three times? since repeatedly infers more than twice? and why only read the top part and not the bottom part? why focus on semantics?
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
it seems pretty clear to me, read the actual rule and not the headline...
edit: btw, i like owenshooter, im sad to hear that he is banned, but i can hardly say that i am surprised. i wish he could come back sooner, the forum will be a much sadder place without him around throwing around the race card and making the only logical posts coming from those that are anti-mod. you could learn a lesson from him jefjef, he may have been partisan, but at least the majority of his posts were well thought out and logical...