Conquer Club

hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Was hahaha3hahaha guesting a bit much?

Poll ended at Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:39 am

 
Total votes : 0

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby MeDeFe on Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:37 am

hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Is anyone in here for or against that ban, actually arguing that that was not full fledged trolling in the exact definition of the word trolling?

Really.

Hey, have your fun, but break the rules and do your time. Its such a simple concept.

=D> for a perfectly warranted ban. It was not only trolling, but was trolling with homophobic, and racist undertones to say the least. The intent was perfectly obvious for anyone that read it.

And if I had to guess, it was the part about the homosexuals that you tried to sneak in that gave them an easy opportunity.
Anyone posting that and not expecting a ban has no reading comprehension skills whatsoever, or...has never been on this forum before.

Oh, and for anyone who just doesnt get it, unless the situation is not clear..

Make a trolling thread about swatstikas, killing jews, hating homosexuals...and you will probably be banned....

Hope that helps.

That was my interpretation of what a swastika represented. The prupose of the thread was to find out CC's stance on them, I just added my own feelings on it, displaying why I thought their stance on it was too harsh. All you just proved to me is that you're either a homosexual or a Jew (which I have no problem with, despite common belief).

Do I interpret this correctly? You think a swastika represents homophobia, racism and killing jews, and you wonder why CC takes such a "harsh stance" on them.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby StephenB on Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:37 am

yeti_c wrote:Which part of Claps post didn't have capitals at the start of the sentences... I see 2 sentences - each beginning with capital letters... you even quoted it above?!

Are you perhaps referring to the letter I? - Which should always be capitalised if talking about oneself?!

Even if I were writing "i" in the middle of the sentence, I would capitalise the i.

C.

Did you read her post?

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=105679&start=16
clapper011 wrote:good sir, that was a warning to stop trolling.. I was in no way saying that they were NOT trolling. They in fact were trolling.


Note: I'm not making a big fuss about this as it doesn't bother me, I'm merely pointing it out.
ManBungalow wrote:TEAM ENGLAND, FART YEAH


the.killing.44 wrote:
StephenB wrote:Why did JR get the special help medal?

I don't know. Needing special help isn't giving it.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class StephenB
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:06 am

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:44 am

StephenB wrote:Who decides whether or not the group on a whole is offended by something if not the individuals of that group? In my opinion, if enough people of a group get offended by something, it is safe to say that that group of people is offended by whatever the thing may be. For example, a lot of black people are offended by the N-word, so I would say that generally black people are offended by the word. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm fully aware that you aren't offended just because you argue the point on the internet, I was talking about people in real life who get offended. Topics like this make for good conversations in forums.



Ok, you are wrong. I didnt say they may not be offended by by a word or the actions or even posts of another person. I said they don't actually care what you think.

And again, in real-life, you assume when people are offended. Its equally silly to think you can judge that, even by what they say or do.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:50 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:Damn, Fitz! In one minute your original post grew 2x in length. I wouldn't be surprised to find that you have calloused fingertips. Does your keyboard wear out every few months?

Nah, maybe your typing speed isn't as ridiculous as that...


Yes. My fingers are calloused, but not from typing.

I know. Its sitting right there up on a tee...as if I could have possibly been stupid enough to miss such an opening..but alas...I almost never do...almost.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby Woodruff on Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:44 am

StephenB wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Which part of Claps post didn't have capitals at the start of the sentences... I see 2 sentences - each beginning with capital letters... you even quoted it above?!

Are you perhaps referring to the letter I? - Which should always be capitalised if talking about oneself?!

Even if I were writing "i" in the middle of the sentence, I would capitalise the i.

C.

Did you read her post?


Did you read his? It wouldn't appear that you did.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby StephenB on Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:01 pm

Woodruff wrote:
StephenB wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Which part of Claps post didn't have capitals at the start of the sentences... I see 2 sentences - each beginning with capital letters... you even quoted it above?!

Are you perhaps referring to the letter I? - Which should always be capitalised if talking about oneself?!

Even if I were writing "i" in the middle of the sentence, I would capitalise the i.

C.

Did you read her post?


Did you read his? It wouldn't appear that you did.

I did actually. He asked which sentence didn't start with a capital letter. It would be blatantly obvious to anyone that had read her post that the first letter of her post was lower case. What makes you think I didn't read his?
ManBungalow wrote:TEAM ENGLAND, FART YEAH


the.killing.44 wrote:
StephenB wrote:Why did JR get the special help medal?

I don't know. Needing special help isn't giving it.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class StephenB
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:06 am

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby Woodruff on Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:31 pm

StephenB wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
StephenB wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Which part of Claps post didn't have capitals at the start of the sentences... I see 2 sentences - each beginning with capital letters... you even quoted it above?!

Are you perhaps referring to the letter I? - Which should always be capitalised if talking about oneself?!

Even if I were writing "i" in the middle of the sentence, I would capitalise the i.

C.

Did you read her post?


Did you read his? It wouldn't appear that you did.

I did actually. He asked which sentence didn't start with a capital letter. It would be blatantly obvious to anyone that had read her post that the first letter of her post was lower case. What makes you think I didn't read his?


Because you and he are clearly talking about different posts. He specifically described the post he was referring to (which was the one you responded to), and you specifically described the post you are referring to. The two of you are clearly not speaking of the same post.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby StephenB on Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:34 pm

Woodruff wrote:Because you and he are clearly talking about different posts. He specifically described the post he was referring to (which was the one you responded to), and you specifically described the post you are referring to. The two of you are clearly not speaking of the same post.

This is the post we were both talking about: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=105679&start=16
clapper011 wrote:good sir, that was a warning to stop trolling.. I was in no way saying that they were NOT trolling. They in fact were trolling.
ManBungalow wrote:TEAM ENGLAND, FART YEAH


the.killing.44 wrote:
StephenB wrote:Why did JR get the special help medal?

I don't know. Needing special help isn't giving it.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class StephenB
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:06 am

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:54 pm

StephenB wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Because you and he are clearly talking about different posts. He specifically described the post he was referring to (which was the one you responded to), and you specifically described the post you are referring to. The two of you are clearly not speaking of the same post.

This is the post we were both talking about: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=105679&start=16
clapper011 wrote:good sir, that was a warning to stop trolling.. I was in no way saying that they were NOT trolling. They in fact were trolling.


ok, so you pointed out the fact that good was not capitalized? that's what was weird to you? excellent catch, but maybe all could move on as interesting as the who didn't capitalize, who did capitilize conversation is, embedded in a thread about homophobia, racism, and trolling. personally, i dont see the big deal about the caps.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby niMic on Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:54 pm

I knew he was an asshole, but I'm not surprised he's a racist and a homophobe as well.

Good riddance.
Image
Highest score: 3772
Highest rank: 15
User avatar
General niMic
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:48 pm

MeDeFe wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Is anyone in here for or against that ban, actually arguing that that was not full fledged trolling in the exact definition of the word trolling?

Really.

Hey, have your fun, but break the rules and do your time. Its such a simple concept.

=D> for a perfectly warranted ban. It was not only trolling, but was trolling with homophobic, and racist undertones to say the least. The intent was perfectly obvious for anyone that read it.

And if I had to guess, it was the part about the homosexuals that you tried to sneak in that gave them an easy opportunity.
Anyone posting that and not expecting a ban has no reading comprehension skills whatsoever, or...has never been on this forum before.

Oh, and for anyone who just doesnt get it, unless the situation is not clear..

Make a trolling thread about swatstikas, killing jews, hating homosexuals...and you will probably be banned....

Hope that helps.

That was my interpretation of what a swastika represented. The prupose of the thread was to find out CC's stance on them, I just added my own feelings on it, displaying why I thought their stance on it was too harsh. All you just proved to me is that you're either a homosexual or a Jew (which I have no problem with, despite common belief).

Do I interpret this correctly? You think a swastika represents homophobia, racism and killing jews, and you wonder why CC takes such a "harsh stance" on them.


Now you are bullshitting and you know it. I said the complete opposite in my thread.
Cook hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:13 pm

hahaha3hahaha wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Is anyone in here for or against that ban, actually arguing that that was not full fledged trolling in the exact definition of the word trolling?

Really.

Hey, have your fun, but break the rules and do your time. Its such a simple concept.

=D> for a perfectly warranted ban. It was not only trolling, but was trolling with homophobic, and racist undertones to say the least. The intent was perfectly obvious for anyone that read it.

And if I had to guess, it was the part about the homosexuals that you tried to sneak in that gave them an easy opportunity.
Anyone posting that and not expecting a ban has no reading comprehension skills whatsoever, or...has never been on this forum before.

Oh, and for anyone who just doesnt get it, unless the situation is not clear..

Make a trolling thread about swatstikas, killing jews, hating homosexuals...and you will probably be banned....

Hope that helps.

That was my interpretation of what a swastika represented. The prupose of the thread was to find out CC's stance on them, I just added my own feelings on it, displaying why I thought their stance on it was too harsh. All you just proved to me is that you're either a homosexual or a Jew (which I have no problem with, despite common belief).

Do I interpret this correctly? You think a swastika represents homophobia, racism and killing jews, and you wonder why CC takes such a "harsh stance" on them.


Now you are bullshitting and you know it. I said the complete opposite in my thread.


Actually, you said that for many the swastika still represents hating jews, but went on to elaborate that it could also be used by those who want to fight against homosexuality and prostitution, fair causes I believe you said they were. That certainly isn't the exact opposite of what you said. It is exactly what you said. Since you were obviously trolling its impossible to know what you may have meant, but I think its pretty clear for anyone where the actually BS lies...

The link is still up there, maybe give it another read. :roll:
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby jefjef on Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:15 pm

MeDeFe wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:About 3 pages of witisms.

Reply to said witisms

Do I interpret this correctly? You think a swastika represents homophobia, racism and killing jews, and you wonder why CC takes such a "harsh stance" on them.


What I "wonder" about the harsh stance CC takes is it seems to be of a selective and a personal "I don't like you" nature. I see nazi threads by 2dimes making statements and posing questions and I see posted NAZI swastika's that ARE NOT harshly stanced against.

Perhaps A printed statement in re of specific banned topics and symbols and words would be proper instead of the "random" interpretations of the vaguely "written/un written rules".

That way we know precisely where to stance.

And NO this is not a troll or a bait. So don't try to twist it that way. It is an uncomfortable truth.

Thank you.

PAGANS
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby MeDeFe on Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:01 pm

hahaha3hahaha wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Is anyone in here for or against that ban, actually arguing that that was not full fledged trolling in the exact definition of the word trolling?

Really.

Hey, have your fun, but break the rules and do your time. Its such a simple concept.

=D> for a perfectly warranted ban. It was not only trolling, but was trolling with homophobic, and racist undertones to say the least. The intent was perfectly obvious for anyone that read it.

And if I had to guess, it was the part about the homosexuals that you tried to sneak in that gave them an easy opportunity.
Anyone posting that and not expecting a ban has no reading comprehension skills whatsoever, or...has never been on this forum before.

Oh, and for anyone who just doesnt get it, unless the situation is not clear..

Make a trolling thread about swatstikas, killing jews, hating homosexuals...and you will probably be banned....

Hope that helps.

That was my interpretation of what a swastika represented. The prupose of the thread was to find out CC's stance on them, I just added my own feelings on it, displaying why I thought their stance on it was too harsh. All you just proved to me is that you're either a homosexual or a Jew (which I have no problem with, despite common belief).

Do I interpret this correctly? You think a swastika represents homophobia, racism and killing jews, and you wonder why CC takes such a "harsh stance" on them.

Now you are bullshitting and you know it. I said the complete opposite in my thread.

Fitz mentions racism, homophobia and the killing of jews together with swastikas.
In a direct reply you state that "that was my interpretation of what a swastika represented".

So please forgive me for drawing the logical conclusion. At least I asked again to verify it.



@jefjef: I have a policy of not becoming active as a moderator over what might amount to minor infractions unless the content is reported or said infractions are massive and obvious in nature. I also have a policy of avoiding moderating topics that tangent me directly, such as this one, as much as I possibly can.

About your proposal of a list of all forbidden symbols/expressions... it initially may seem like a good idea, but there are several problems with it.
Firstly, the list will always be behind the times. New symbols/expressions (henceforth called "items") that fulfill the same function that the original ones were forbidden for will constantly crop up, causing the list to become bloated. This will also allow those who really are bent on trolling to do so as long as they avoid using the listed items. This will especially be the case if the listed items are very specific.
Secondly, if the list consists of broad terms that encompass categories, some items that should not be forbidden will also be included, and some items that should be will not be. That brings us right back to the problem of interpretation you mentioned. In fact, that is pretty much what we have in the community guidelines, with some things being rather broad, and others highly specific.

A better solution might be to develop a procedure for determining whether something is trolling/spamming/flaming/whatever that minimizes subjective interpretation of a matter. If you come up with a good idea for that, please do tell, I'd be very interested in it.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:13 pm

jefjef wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:About 3 pages of witisms.

Reply to said witisms

Do I interpret this correctly? You think a swastika represents homophobia, racism and killing jews, and you wonder why CC takes such a "harsh stance" on them.


What I "wonder" about the harsh stance CC takes is it seems to be of a selective and a personal "I don't like you" nature. I see nazi threads by 2dimes making statements and posing questions and I see posted NAZI swastika's that ARE NOT harshly stanced against.

Perhaps A printed statement in re of specific banned topics and symbols and words would be proper instead of the "random" interpretations of the vaguely "written/un written rules".

That way we know precisely where to stance.

And NO this is not a troll or a bait. So don't try to twist it that way. It is an uncomfortable truth.

Thank you.

PAGANS


It wasnt the topic, or the content, per-se but the obvious intent to troll that he was banned for. It wasnt for any honest discussion of a swastika or what it meant, and the "fair fight against homosexuals and prostitutes" was the give away.

Maybe someone might get away with posting something like that, but I dont think anyone should expect to..and to be surprised about being banned for that is just silly in my opinion.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:45 pm

It is evident both you (AAfitz) and medefe agree with prostitution and/or homosexuality. I simply raised the point that neo-Nazis fought against things like these because I know a lot of people would agree with me that it can be seen as a good cause, if dealt with appropropriately (did I ever say gay-bashing is the right way? NO). This was a fraction of my thread anyway, so do not dare put words in my mouth and do not fabricate things, EVER. No matter how much status you think you have. I was merely exploring the definition of what a swastika represents. If you can quote me anywhere in that thread saying that I agreed with any of it, please place the extracts here. The whole point of my thread was to find out why swastikas were such forbidden things in CC, seeing that I have no personal issue with them. It seems that you are LOOKING for people to accuse of trolling.

All you have done is taken a sentence out of my thread, taken it out of context, and accused me of a being homophobe and a Nazi. YOU both are more so a trolls than I.
Cook hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:10 pm

hahaha3hahaha wrote:It is evident both you (AAfitz) and medefe agree with prostitution and/or homosexuality. I simply raised the point that neo-Nazis fought against things like these because I know a lot of people would agree with me that it can be seen as a good cause, if dealt with appropropriately (did I ever say gay-bashing is the right way? NO). This was a fraction of my thread anyway, so do not dare put words in my mouth and do not fabricate things, EVER. No matter how much status you think you have. I was merely exploring the definition of what a swastika represents. If you can quote me anywhere in that thread saying that I agreed with any of it, please place the extracts here. The whole point of my thread was to find out why swastikas were such forbidden things in CC, seeing that I have no personal issue with them. It seems that you are LOOKING for people to accuse of trolling.

All you have done is taken a sentence out of my thread, taken it out of context, and accused me of a being homophobe and a Nazi. YOU both are more so a trolls than I.


You posted that you think a fight for prostitution and homosexuality was a good fight. You also posted that some use the swastika as a symbol of racism. This is not out of context, not trolling, but a simple fact, and no one is accusing you of trolling. Only explaining why you received your ban for trolling.

You keep trying to redefine what you wrote, but since its right there, it simply isnt going to work. Calling a fight against homosexuals a good fight, is homophobia by definition. The mere suggestion that there is something to fight is homophobia in itself. This is hardly out of context, and is so obviously trolling.

It is you taking sentences out of context...no one called you a homophobe. We only posted that you made homophobic comments. Since its more than obvious you were trolling, it would silly to make any actual character judgments other than that you were comfortable making such statements...and now, defending such actions to boot.

As far as being trolls, we are discussing why you were banned, and are explaining, and discussing it in detail. While I wouldn't expect you to necessarily agree with it, that doesn't make it trolling.

Trolling is posting something inflamatory with the intent of offending, or provoking outrage among other posters. Its fairly clear my intent is to just explain the situation here. If you are offended or outraged, its understandable, since you're the subject of the post, but that does not make it trolling, since its not personal, and quite frankly, an excellent description of the entire situation.
Last edited by AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:17 pm

AAFitz wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:It is evident both you (AAfitz) and medefe agree with prostitution and/or homosexuality. I simply raised the point that neo-Nazis fought against things like these because I know a lot of people would agree with me that it can be seen as a good cause, if dealt with appropropriately (did I ever say gay-bashing is the right way? NO). This was a fraction of my thread anyway, so do not dare put words in my mouth and do not fabricate things, EVER. No matter how much status you think you have. I was merely exploring the definition of what a swastika represents. If you can quote me anywhere in that thread saying that I agreed with any of it, please place the extracts here. The whole point of my thread was to find out why swastikas were such forbidden things in CC, seeing that I have no personal issue with them. It seems that you are LOOKING for people to accuse of trolling.

All you have done is taken a sentence out of my thread, taken it out of context, and accused me of a being homophobe and a Nazi. YOU both are more so a trolls than I.


You posted that you think a fight for prostitution and homosexuality was a good fight. You also posted that some use the swastika as a symbol of racism. This is not out of context, not trolling, but a simple fact, and no one is accusing you of trolling. Only explaining why you received your ban for trolling.

You keep trying to redefine what you wrote, but since its right there, it simply isnt going to work. Calling a fight against homosexuals a good fight, is homophobia by definition. The mere suggestion that there is something to fight is homophobia in itself. This is hardly out of context, and is so obviously trolling.

It is you taking sentences out of context...no one called you a homophobe. We only posted that you made homophobic comments. Since its more than obvious you were trolling, it would silly to make any actual character judgments other than that you were comfortable making such statements...and now, defending such actions to boot.


Stop being such an analytical prick and stop reading in between the lines! You're replacing the word 'cause' with 'fight', to make it sound barbaric. Secondly, yes, I admit, I said some who identify themselves with swastikas are still doing cruel, wicked things, but I simply proposed that we see the other side of it, the people who stand up for worthy causes, maybe, in my opinion, prostitution and homosexuality, but not limited to that! All forms of (let me quote myself) political, social and racial injustices. This includes things such as government corruption and power abuse and things like that. As I stated earlier, you're taking a few words and making out as if that was my whole thread.
Cook hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby AAFitz on Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:27 pm

hahaha3hahaha wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:It is evident both you (AAfitz) and medefe agree with prostitution and/or homosexuality. I simply raised the point that neo-Nazis fought against things like these because I know a lot of people would agree with me that it can be seen as a good cause, if dealt with appropropriately (did I ever say gay-bashing is the right way? NO). This was a fraction of my thread anyway, so do not dare put words in my mouth and do not fabricate things, EVER. No matter how much status you think you have. I was merely exploring the definition of what a swastika represents. If you can quote me anywhere in that thread saying that I agreed with any of it, please place the extracts here. The whole point of my thread was to find out why swastikas were such forbidden things in CC, seeing that I have no personal issue with them. It seems that you are LOOKING for people to accuse of trolling.

All you have done is taken a sentence out of my thread, taken it out of context, and accused me of a being homophobe and a Nazi. YOU both are more so a trolls than I.


You posted that you think a fight for prostitution and homosexuality was a good fight. You also posted that some use the swastika as a symbol of racism. This is not out of context, not trolling, but a simple fact, and no one is accusing you of trolling. Only explaining why you received your ban for trolling.

You keep trying to redefine what you wrote, but since its right there, it simply isnt going to work. Calling a fight against homosexuals a good fight, is homophobia by definition. The mere suggestion that there is something to fight is homophobia in itself. This is hardly out of context, and is so obviously trolling.

It is you taking sentences out of context...no one called you a homophobe. We only posted that you made homophobic comments. Since its more than obvious you were trolling, it would silly to make any actual character judgments other than that you were comfortable making such statements...and now, defending such actions to boot.


Stop being such an analytical prick and stop reading in between he lines! You're replacing the word 'cause' with 'fight', to make it sound barbaric. Secondly, yes, I admit, I said some who identify themselves with swastikas are still doing cruel, wicked things, but I simply proposed that we see the other side of it, the people who stand up for worthy causes, maybe, in my opinion, prostitution and homosexuality, but not limited to that! All forms of (let me quote myself) political, social and racial injustices. This includes things such as government corruption and power abuse and things like that. As I stated earlier, you're taking a few words and making out as if that was my whole thread.


Stop reading between the lines? Stop being analytical? You posted a thread about nazis, the swastika, prostitution and homosexuals, and expect it not to be analyzed? Really? I think that almost proves you were trolling right there.

I'm sorry you posted what you did, and the words you chose mean what they mean, but that's what you posted, why it was trolling, and why you were unable to post for however long.

As far as using the word fight... that is the word you used:
hahaha3hahaha wrote:Maybe there are still groups existing today that carry on that line, but what about the ones that fight against things like prostitution and homosexuality- I think those are very fair causes.


Im not replacing anything. Im simply quoting what you wrote...again, the link is at the top of the page...perhaps you need to read it again...It is interesting to see you call the phrase barbaric however. There you have my complete agreement.

You use an example of groups that fight against homosexuality and prostitution as a contrast to the groups that simply use the swastika for hatred of jews, and that is why it is important to your post. Its a concrete example, and is not being taken out of context in any way shape or form. The reason that line is mentioned and quoted, is because I firmly believe it is what got you busted, and why you deserve the ban for trolling. Without it, I might actually have been fooled that your goal was an intellectual discussion of the many uses of the swastika, but it was that line that showed it was just a trolling thread, designed to elicit offense by many.

What I am saddened by, is that you cant seem to understand that people will fight such statements without being in those groups. You've posted that you assume I'm jewish, homosexual, and now agree with prostitution. Its just a damn shame that you would make such an assumption so quickly, and not realize that one does not need to be in a group to defend it, or more importantly, fight against bigoted statements about said groups....granted, given that this got started with you trolling, and I am quite certain that it is just a continuation of said trolling... I'm not too concerned. Either way, as mentioned before, no one truly cares what you think anyways. If you do actually feel that way, and aren't just trolling, than once again, thats your problem.

If, however, you are apologizing for including that line, and agree it was a bad decision, and had no place on this forum, than I would say you have learned your lesson, and would be impressed with your ability to actually take responsibility for your actions. Personally, I think you were lucky not to have received the vacation for violating the CC anti-bigotry rules, which after quoting your line about a "fight against homosexuality as a very fair cause" certainly could have been warranted.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby jefjef on Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:58 am

Well atm the poll is 50%. Right down the middle.

This following quote is being cited as the offending portion of hahaha3hahaha post.

hahaha3hahaha wrote:Maybe there are still groups existing today that carry on that line, but what about the ones that fight against things like prostitution and homosexuality- I think those are very fair causes.

If he had written:

what about the ones that fight against crime - I think those are very fair causes.

Would he still have been punished? FYI. Prostitution is criminal in the VAST majority of the US. Homosexuality and/or activities pertaining to it is also criminal in many states too. Ever hear of sodomy laws? Right or wrong they do exist on the books.

Well anyway. Poll closes tomorrow.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:07 am

In a nutshell, I wasn't banned for anything to do with Nazis or trolling, I was banned because medefe agrees with homosexuality and prostitution. I'm going to leave the thread at that.
Cook hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby Woodruff on Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:52 am

jefjef wrote:Well atm the poll is 50%. Right down the middle.

This following quote is being cited as the offending portion of hahaha3hahaha post.

hahaha3hahaha wrote:Maybe there are still groups existing today that carry on that line, but what about the ones that fight against things like prostitution and homosexuality- I think those are very fair causes.

If he had written:

what about the ones that fight against crime - I think those are very fair causes.

Would he still have been punished? FYI. Prostitution is criminal in the VAST majority of the US. Homosexuality and/or activities pertaining to it is also criminal in many states too. Ever hear of sodomy laws? Right or wrong they do exist on the books.


Incorrect - homosexuality is NOT criminal in ANY state. Period. None. Homosexual ACTS may be, but homosexuality itself is not. If you cannot distinguish between the two, then you should not be involved in the discussion, to be honest.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:55 am

Woodruff wrote:
jefjef wrote:Well atm the poll is 50%. Right down the middle.

This following quote is being cited as the offending portion of hahaha3hahaha post.

hahaha3hahaha wrote:Maybe there are still groups existing today that carry on that line, but what about the ones that fight against things like prostitution and homosexuality- I think those are very fair causes.

If he had written:

what about the ones that fight against crime - I think those are very fair causes.

Would he still have been punished? FYI. Prostitution is criminal in the VAST majority of the US. Homosexuality and/or activities pertaining to it is also criminal in many states too. Ever hear of sodomy laws? Right or wrong they do exist on the books.


Incorrect - homosexuality is NOT criminal in ANY state. Period. None. Homosexual ACTS may be, but homosexuality itself is not. If you cannot distinguish between the two, then you should not be involved in the discussion, to be honest.


Gotta love how the Americans think it's all about them. There are many countries where homosexuality, not just limited to homosexual acts, is completely outlawed.
Cook hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby parker4s on Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:02 am

"In the States"- Bad term to use right there. Different things apply in different countries. Isnt this someones opinion. I mean look at where they live in perspective to us. How is it putting a group down if something is outlawed in someones environment. I mean do we get banned for saying man those drunks are..... Finish the sentece. In some cultures maybe something as little as that could be seen as haneous. If CC is so liberal.... then why is it that some opinions on things that other countries would not allow.. are allowed on here... but when it switches perspective to someone from a different background, they cant hold their opinions to what is in their law, their systeming, their government.... Idk its late but i hope that makes sense. Hahaha should not have been banned.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant parker4s
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:18 pm

Re: hahaha3hahaha has been GUESTED

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:16 am

:lol: I am at 51% now. Majority rules in favor of thine self 8-)
Cook hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users