Conquer Club

Top 10 Highest Scores (without Team points)

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Postby poo-maker on Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:57 pm

wow, u really suck at team games... but nice record in the singles though. looks like i wont be joining the list :cry:
Brigadier poo-maker
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:58 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Postby Kid_A on Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:05 pm

hehe. yeah i do. but i believe that puts me at 3rd all time for singles matches :D
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby Stopper on Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:37 am

Kid_A wrote:I suck at team games


Oh, great! Now I find out!
User avatar
Lieutenant Stopper
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am
Location: Supposed to be working...

Postby juventino on Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:11 am

New plan.....

I have 3000 points. Lose them down to about 500.

Then only play singels. Perhaps gain up to 2000-2300 who knows.

Before I had a gain in team of perhaps 700 points. Now i get a net loss for 1800 points (2500-700). That means I should have 4000 points if i would only get single points?

I really like this list. It is fun and it needs to be done. But I have started to think it is almost impossible to get a fair one, doing the math yourself. It must be done within the program and counting team and single games seperatly. Perhaps it can be done in the future.
User avatar
Major juventino
 
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:09 am

Postby Kid_A on Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:15 am

Stopper wrote:
Kid_A wrote:I suck at team games


Oh, great! Now I find out!


we're about to win that one so dont worry :D
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

flawed

Postby Blitzaholic on Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:23 am

juventino wrote:New plan.....

I have 3000 points. Lose them down to about 500.

Then only play singels. Perhaps gain up to 2000-2300 who knows.

Before I had a gain in team of perhaps 700 points. Now i get a net loss for 1800 points (2500-700). That means I should have 4000 points if i would only get single points?

I really like this list. It is fun and it needs to be done. But I have started to think it is almost impossible to get a fair one, doing the math yourself. It must be done within the program and counting team and single games seperatly. Perhaps it can be done in the future.


Well Juventino, I got a 1982 singles rank and teams killed my singles score big time, this is why my singles rank is handicapped, perhaps I will lose all my team games now, all of them, hmmmmmmm, so let's see here, I just lost 3600 points from my rank, but I had 1982 in singles, so, hmmmm, I got a 5582 rank in singles, sweet, LOL. Obviously I would never do this, but it shows how flawed this can be!
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby ZawBanjito on Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:04 am

Har har, nice to know I'm still in the top 10 at something.

You bums all bettah watch out though. I've got no vacation days left until the age of 40 and I've just entered a relationship with a girl who lives far far away. I've got nothing to do at night now except stare you down. Down, down, down. Moohoohahahahaha.
User avatar
Colonel ZawBanjito
 
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:25 am
Location: Somewhere

kid A

Postby Blitzaholic on Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:49 am

Kid_A wrote:My current score is 2440.

After doing the math, I've lost a total of 184 points in team games (I suck at team games)

So if I'd never played a team game, my score would be:

2624


that is impressive kid A, well done :wink:

and Robin I got 2 more singles scores for you, these are precise to the letter, Artur1 has 2441 singles rank and Goatboy has 2290 singles rank, you may want to extent it to top 20, or top 10 and next 10, hope this helps.

and what about gotheart86? he may be up there, I know he won the battle royal for like 700 points or so, would that count? or asterik?
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby Robinette on Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:07 am

juventino wrote:New plan.....

I have 3000 points. Lose them down to about 500.

Then only play singels. Perhaps gain up to 2000-2300 who knows.

Before I had a gain in team of perhaps 700 points. Now i get a net loss for 1800 points (2500-700). That means I should have 4000 points if i would only get single points?

I really like this list. It is fun and it needs to be done. But I have started to think it is almost impossible to get a fair one, doing the math yourself. It must be done within the program and counting team and single games seperatly. Perhaps it can be done in the future.


:shock: yikes... of course i new this was only accurate for those who have only played a small % of team games... and the higher the ratio of team games the more skued the score....

but i never really thought thru the potential to abuse it.... well, this scoring system is definetly broken.
User avatar
Brigadier Robinette
 
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Postby Kid_A on Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:52 pm

:-k hmm....still dont see my name on that list. :wink:
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby sully800 on Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:27 pm

juventino wrote:New plan.....

I have 3000 points. Lose them down to about 500.

Then only play singels. Perhaps gain up to 2000-2300 who knows.

Before I had a gain in team of perhaps 700 points. Now i get a net loss for 1800 points (2500-700). That means I should have 4000 points if i would only get single points?

I really like this list. It is fun and it needs to be done. But I have started to think it is almost impossible to get a fair one, doing the math yourself. It must be done within the program and counting team and single games seperatly. Perhaps it can be done in the future.


Yeah, as Robin said the more team games you have played the less accurate this is. People with a vast majority of singles games will end up very close to what their score would actually be.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Postby Robinette on Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:18 pm

sully800 wrote:
juventino wrote:New plan.....

I have 3000 points. Lose them down to about 500.

Then only play singels. Perhaps gain up to 2000-2300 who knows.

Before I had a gain in team of perhaps 700 points. Now i get a net loss for 1800 points (2500-700). That means I should have 4000 points if i would only get single points?

I really like this list. It is fun and it needs to be done. But I have started to think it is almost impossible to get a fair one, doing the math yourself. It must be done within the program and counting team and single games seperatly. Perhaps it can be done in the future.


Yeah, as Robin said the more team games you have played the less accurate this is. People with a vast majority of singles games will end up very close to what their score would actually be.

hey sully, you think you could figure out some sort of a ratio effect for this... I know it won't be accurate, but maybe we could create a crude handicap...
User avatar
Brigadier Robinette
 
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Postby sully800 on Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:48 pm

I'll look into it :)

Also of note- I just bumped Juventino out of the 6th place spot. :D
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Postby Cheeri-O on Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:55 pm

ill be up there some day (in a million years)
User avatar
Private Cheeri-O
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:15 pm

Postby juventino on Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:14 am

sully800 wrote:
Also of note- I just bumped Juventino out of the 6th place spot. :D



I who just started to like you
User avatar
Major juventino
 
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:09 am

Postby Kid_A on Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:41 am

Kid_A wrote::-k hmm....still dont see my name on that list. :wink:
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby chessplaya on Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:14 am

Kid_A wrote:
Kid_A wrote::-k hmm....still dont see my name on that list. :wink:


YOU R TRULY AN A+++ NAGGER ARENT YA :P :wink:
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby Kid_A on Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:15 am

chessplaya wrote:
Kid_A wrote:
Kid_A wrote::-k hmm....still dont see my name on that list. :wink:


YOU R TRULY AN A+++ NAGGER ARENT YA :P :wink:


not done yet CHEESEplaya? :D
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby chessplaya on Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:16 am

Kid_A wrote:
chessplaya wrote:
Kid_A wrote:
Kid_A wrote::-k hmm....still dont see my name on that list. :wink:


YOU R TRULY AN A+++ NAGGER ARENT YA :P :wink:


not done yet CHEESEplaya? :D


what ur doing awake at this time man ???
let's RT!!!
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby Kid_A on Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:20 am

o hell no!!

about to go to sleep. cant be up for another 3 hours!
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby chessplaya on Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:22 am

Kid_A wrote:o hell no!!

about to go to sleep. cant be up for another 3 hours!


who said 3 ours i need 20 min to eliminate u :roll: 8)
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby Kid_A on Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:26 am

:roll:
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby Robinette on Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:33 pm

I now present to you...
Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores
(without team points)




....................... current score .............. current ............. highest .......
.......................... with NO...................... score................. score .......
........................ team games.............(1st wk of April)........... ever .......

1. Lazaruslong . . . .2732 . . . . . . . . . . . 2886 . . . . . . . . 2886
2. Robinette. . . . . . 2669 . . . . . . . . . . . 2785 . . . . . . . . 3021
3. Nuke . . . . . . . . . 2641 . . . . . . . . . . . 2641 . . . . . . . . 3160
4. Kid_A . . . . . . . . .2534 . . . . . . . . . . . 2534 . . . . . . . . 2534?
5. Cyberdaniel. . . . 2533 . . . . . . . . . . . 2654 . . . . . . . . 3145

6. artur1 . . . . . . . . .2497. . . . . . . . . . . 2531 . . . . . . . . 2531?
7. sully800 . . . . . . .2316 . . . . . . . . . . .2316 . . . . . . . . 2387
8. Goatboy . . . . . . . 2313. . . . . . . . . . . 2340. . . . . . . . .2340?
9. ZawBanjito. . . . . 2221 . . . . . . . . . . .2221. . . . . . . . .2558
10. RL_Orange. . . . 2094. . . . . . . . . . .2094. . . . . . . . . 3088



What is not displayed, is what the highest score each person above has achieved without team games....

The approximate high scores would give us a list that would look something like this:

1. Nuke ................. 3160
2. RL_Orange ....... 3088
3. cyberdaniel....... 3050
4. Robinette ......... 2950
5. Lazaruslong ..... 2750
6. zawbanjito........ 2550
7. Kid_A ................ 2534
8. artur1 ............... 2497
9. sully800............ 2350
10. Goatboy .......... 2313



Many problems exisit in trying to create an accurate list of singles only scores with the current scoring system.
In an effort to create a fair representation, without encouraging anyone to manipulate any scoring system, this list has been revamped with 2 changes....

The 1st problem to be addressed was the accuracy of removing team scores. As pointed out earlier in this thread, the higher the ratio of team games the higher the scoring error can be. The solution to this 1st problem is to limit this list to players who focus on singles games, using 88% minimum single games... or no more than 12% being team games.

The 2nd problem was the method of adjusting the score when someone had poor team scores. As pointed out in this thread, intentional team losses would be calculated as point gains in your singles score. The solution to this 2nd problem is to limit the point adjustment to a zero gain effect for the singles score.

Obviously this is not the perfect way to calculate these scores, but it is the best we can do with what we have to work with. There are many who continue to have their fingers crossed that Lack will improve the situation with regards to score calculations in the coming update. I am one of those people.


Scores have been REDUCED to remove any Positive effect from team games...
All scores were verified between 3/31 and 4/7/07 unless noted otherwise
Last edited by Robinette on Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Brigadier Robinette
 
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Postby qeee1 on Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:57 pm

what happened to me?
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
User avatar
Colonel qeee1
 
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:57 pm

what did my score come out to ?
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

PreviousNext

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users