Death of casual?

[ljex]

The games I have referenced (doodle/lux assassin) are so beyond luck based that I derive no enjoyment from them other than progress on a medal and yet you continue to attack me as if I am afraid to play vs good competition.

Nah that was Woodruff that implied you were afraid to play against good competition.
I'm saying you might not like playing games not set up by yourself because there is more risk/less control involved.

I am one of 4 children but you can act like I am a spoiled brat all you want without even knowing me or taking a look at my game/user history.

Are you the youngest then?(They have a tendency to be spoiled too)

Lol, jk. But really I wasn't responding to you specifically, just everyone who thinks their games should fill because they are theirs. And you do know me, ljex. I played some oasis games on your team back in the day and quite frankly I'm hurt you don't remember.

I have no care in the world about what my score is, i play the games that are fun and dont worry about the rest.

I am actually the oldest of my four siblings.

[Funkyterrance]

well said ljex...to bad no one will lsiten.

count yourself among the handful of people who even read that post in its entirety

Yeah I read your lengthy post in it's entirety and it's a suggestion, not really relevant to the discussion at hand which is whether or not to put old games or new games at the top. One is better for farmers, one is worse. It's also a suggestion that would require a LOT of organization while the games list is a quick fix.

I don't think anyone is worried about the farmers who are going for conqueror, they get caught nowadays. The farmers I'm referring to are those who generate 50 games to maintain their rank(mid-range) by farming a "cash cow" quads map while they lose at their other games due to medal hunting, traditional maps, clan wars, speeders, etc..