qwert wrote:Im just check map rank, and i must say,that without city mogul-king_herpes will be cook,even if he have great score in Waterlo,all other map have normal scores,and in large number of hem he have catastrophic results.
3137 games-win 2115-points -minus 3727
---------------------------------------------------
City mogul
2361 games-win 2288-points +6840
relative rank-noob farmer
------------------------------
Waterlo 415 games-win 334-points +4566-relative rank-noob farmer
-----------------
if you remove waterlo,then hes score is minus 8293.
unfortunatly map rank can not show-who whas hes opponents rank in these two maps.
Check
anyone's map rank and then take off their two best maps, and you'll get the same results. My current score is 1492, but if you take out my best map (Doodle Earth) then I drop to 507, and my second best map (Australia) then I also drop to negative points at -66. Sure, it's not as extreme as KH, but then again, I tend to play a wide variety of maps rather than a few that I'm really good at. That's why I'm Sgt 1st Class, and KH is Conquerer, and I'm fine with that.
Let's look at your's qwert. Current points are at 1904, removing best map (Circus Maximus) you drop to 1097, and taking your second best map (Imperium Romanum) off, you drop to 482. Again, it's not as extreme, but I expect that in a player who's goal
isn't to be the Conquerer.
My point is that there is a reason that any player's best map is their best map - because it's what they're best at. It's a simple assumption that removing their best map from the equation is going to devastate a player's score. JB was pointing out that even if you remove KH's best map from the equation, he is still a very good player.