colton24 wrote:Turbowheel wrote:SFX! wrote:Turbowheel wrote:colton24 wrote:
A PFC as a mentor?
Yes, you see there's a thing called a rank restriction on the site if you haven't looked. No matter what your score is, you can't advance in rank if you don't have the required number of games finished. Maybe you should try and know the site first.
Rank isn't everything also. You can be a new recruit or even a cook and still beat the best person on this site. Heck, I've even beaten Sergeant First Classes before. I did a team game before where my entire team was about outranked completely yet we won, partially due to my straegies too I must say. So don't think for one second that anyone who's not very high ranking can't be a effective mentor because they can.
1. Sergeant 1st Class is no rank to boast about being or beating. I'd say when you get some swords you get that bragging right.
2. The majority who are a high rank are much more experienced in tactics, maps etc.
3. To be a Private 1st Class you only need 5 completed games, so your argument about not advancing in rank isn't very valid. I've seen a player who's a Lieutenant with over 2000pts, that's something remarkable.
1. For someone who's not high ranked to out tatic someone who's supposely more experienced in tatics, maps, etc according to you isn't very good? I'd say it is at least a little.
2. Yeah, and how many games has that lieutenant played? I'll bet you that my number of games done is no where near that persons, so he probaly has alot more wins to, maybe even a better win/loss ratio. Plus, that's one out of how many members on this site??? If you can prove all the higher ranking players are that good(including you) then I won't try to be a mentor ever I promise.
3. As I said before on my original statement, I've played other games like this that are similar to Risk and such alot of times, so I don't NEED to be on this site a long time and be high up in ranking yet to say I know how to play the game good and be a good strategist and tactician.
4. I'm not saying I'm some grand genius like you seem to imply I'm trying to say, but I'm good enough to give advice AT THE LEAST.
No you aren't good for a mentor as you can see by this:
Username: Turbowheel
Rank: Private 1st Class
Score: 1042
Games: 11 completed, 4 (36%) won | Find all games with Turbowheel
Most of the majors are around that exact percentage. Here's a group for example:
# Username score GC GW Percent Rank Rating Country ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1014 Dotacus 2020 661 229 (35%) Major 4.8 United States
1015 lordnex 2020 535 207 (39%) Major 4.8 Serbia
1016 Pander88uk 2019 1156 414 (36%) Major 4.9 United Kingdom
1017 oaktown 2019 551 229 (42%) Major 4.9 United States
1018 Nikita42 2018 1327 401 (30%) Major 4.8 Canada
1019 JD8 2018 82 35 (43%) Major 4.7 United States
1020 Kid_A 2017 5336 2206 (41%) Major 4.7 United States
1021 THORNHEART 2017 2719 949 (35%) Major 3.9 United States
1022 Magic_Ugn 2017 507 177 (35%) Major 4.7 Sweden
1023 DreadCat 2017 270 110 (41%) Major 4.9 United States
You also can't judge a person by how big a rank they have or by how many games completed. Take the above group for example. The only thing separating me from them is purely rank and score. Depending on the people they normally face in a game and on the game situation at the start, you can't even judge by percentage of games won. Face it, you guys are being stereotypical, espescially since you should know that games like on this site similar to Risk exist elsewhere on the web(which I've played plenty of), so it would not be wrong in saying that how long people have played on this paticular site and their rank have no worth in judgement whatsoever of a person's abilities.