Mod Approval rating [day 4] no change

[a.sub]

simply vote and post a quick snippet to keep the thread alive
i wanna see this over time, and you can change your vote as time goes on

the approval percent is as follows
(4a+3b+2c+d)/(4a+4b+4c+4d+4e)
a= # off people that voted for a 4
b= # off people that voted for a 3
c= # off people that voted for a 2
d= # off people that voted for a 1
e= # off people that voted for a 0

Chart over time
Day#.........Approval%
1.............70.2%
2.............73.1%
3.............73.2%
4.............73.2%
5.............74.0%
6.............
7.............
8.............
9.............
10.............

[Woodruff]

THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DISCUSS YOUR OPINIONS ON MODS

I firmly believe that every mod on here is very serious about trying to make Conquer Club a better, more enjoyable place for everyone. However, I believe there is too much inconsistency, based on the personal views of the moderators on what constitutes "too far".

[GENERAL STONEHAM]

THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DISCUSS YOUR OPINIONS ON MODS

I firmly believe that every mod on here is very serious about trying to make Conquer Club a better, more enjoyable place for everyone. However, I believe there is too much inconsistency, based on the personal views of the moderators on what constitutes "too far".

Agreed, but instead of "too far" I'd say biased.

[jpcloet]

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

[the.killing.44]

The spread of mods is just too big IMO. It's been said before, and it's worth reiterating. Tourneys and maps wouldn't work without the TDs and CAs, respectively. Also, the Hunters have the tools that are most of the time clinchers on cases. So those three must have high ratings in function (attitude, etc. is a different matter) to even be there. But judging the global and regular forum-specific mods is an entirely subjective matter, so you'd have to multiple polls: first for attitude and perspective and another for the way they operate; and also one for the directly pro-CC causes (maps, tourneys, multis) and the forum-modding things.

.44

[ronsizzle]

The spread of mods is just too big IMO. It's been said before, and it's worth reiterating. Tourneys and maps wouldn't work without the TDs and CAs, respectively. Also, the Hunters have the tools that are most of the time clinchers on cases. So those three must have high ratings in function (attitude, etc. is a different matter) to even be there. But judging the global and regular forum-specific mods is an entirely subjective matter, so you'd have to multiple polls: first for attitude and perspective and another for the way they operate; and also one for the directly pro-CC causes (maps, tourneys, multis) and the forum-modding things.

.44

i stand by whatever 44 said! and will say!

[InsomniaRed]

Do Chat mods count for anything?


.....I didn't think so

[a.sub]

Do Chat mods count for anything?


.....I didn't think so

awwww dont worry im sure kill was just kidding

[Woodruff]

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

I am, yes. Although mostly the forum moderators. And I don't mean this to be a slam on them or anything...I rated them a 3. I think they're doing a generally decent job. I just think more consistency between them is needed.

[Thezzaruz]

THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DISCUSS YOUR OPINIONS ON MODS

Well that will fail miserably...

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

You have a big tag saying "moderator" below your name, I'd guess that's a hint.

[john9blue]

Aww, I click on this thinking we get to rate each mod individually...

Oh yeah, and why not just average the votes and multiply by 25?

[clapper011]

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

which is well... the majority of us "mods" LOL

[a.sub]

Aww, I click on this thinking we get to rate each mod individually...

Oh yeah, and why not just average the votes and multiply by 25?

my equation is simply the sum of the points divided by the total number of points possible (if everyone voted 4s) so it is the average

[The Fuzzy Pengui]

So this is just for mods in general, not a specific group of mods...right?

If it's for in general, I'm giving us a 3...there's always room for improvement. Even though we're probably the best right now than we've been in a long time (possibly the best we've ever been), we'll never be the highest rating possible...simply because, like I said, there's always room for us to improve.

PS - Red, no...you don't just kidding

[JoshyBoy]

Internet Connection for a month - $35
Premium membership for a year - $25
Watching mods continually ban people like owenshooter and lock numerous threads whilst taking away General Stoneham's beloved Flame Wars - PRICELESS!!!

Keep it up mods. You make this site.

[daydream]

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

aren't all mods volunteers?

[murphy16]

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

All, since I'm not sure where you fall under jp, great job.

[redhawk92]

do admins make any money for there services?

[Timminz]

What's the point of updating this every day, when we can't change our votes?

[a.sub]

What's the point of updating this every day, when we can't change our votes?

you can change your votes
at least its letting me

[Timminz]

I can't.

[a.sub]

Click image to enlarge.

[wcaclimbing]

Not sure if this counts as a mod action, but Natewolfman (tourney organizer) is spamming people with links to his 'my brute' page...

Friend just sent me this site, its quite addictive lol, Click on the link below and make a character to fight mine, take a look Ive got 3 main characters, choose any one of them to check out

http://natewolfman.mybrute.com

http://tiberon-lan.mybrute.com

http://yuna-s-team.mybrute.com

[Timminz]

Can anyone other than the OP change their vote?

[kiddicus maximus]

The spread of mods is just too big IMO.

.44

Big Brother is watching.

Nice job using the FML app icon for your avatar, I giggled.